The Steel Cage

RSS

Newsday tag team champs Alfonso Castillo and Seth Mates slam you with pro wrestling news and insights.

search this blog
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

  • Exclusive interview: Sammartino on WWE H.O.F., Hogan, possibility of working with McMahon

    Pro wrestling legend Bruno Sammartino

     It would not be an exaggeration to call Bruno Sammartino one of the most important figures in WWE’s history. And some wrestling historians could make a heck of an argument as to why "one of" should be removed from that sentence. And so, each year when WWE inducts a new class into its Hall of Fame, Bruno’s absence becomes all the more conspicuous.

    Sammartino is unquestionably the largest omission from the WWE Hall of Fame, and Vince McMahon is well aware of that fact. Although it seems McMahon deliberately snubbed Sammartino in the early days of the Hall of Fame when McMahon was only inducted his best friends, as the Hall grew in credibility, he too realized having one of the company’s biggest drawing acts in history was essential. But Sammartino has balked so far.

    While doing some reporting for an obituary on the late Capt. Lou Albano, I had the privilege of interviewing Sammartino by phone. After talking about Albano for several minutes, I mentioned to the legendary two-time World Wide Wrestling Federation Champion that I had recently written an article in which I argued that WWE should induct him into the Hall of Fame regardless of whether Bruno gave his blessing or not. Bruno quite vehemently disagreed. A rather lively discussion ensued.

    I should mention to you, as I did before hand to Bruno, that – for all intents and purposes – I was taking off my reporter’s hat for this conversation. Rather, as a wrestling fan, I wanted to engage in a debate about why Bruno should accept WWE’s invitation to be part of the Hall of Fame. And, as you might sense by the end of the interview, I’d like to think we made a little bit of progress.

    Unfortunately, the first few minutes of my taped conversation with Bruno are largely inaudible, making it impossible for me to transcribe it. A lot of the points that were made early in our conversation were later reiterated, as you’ll see. But basically, Bruno began by telling me the story of the last time he met with Vince McMahon in 2005.

    Bruno said he was filming some sort of documentary on his life in Pittsburgh, and the filmmakers had the idea of interviewing him inside a wrestling ring. As it happened, WWE was coming to town, and someone had the idea of reaching out to the company and asking permission to use one of its rings for the interview. WWE officials were agreeable, but one of the conditions was that Bruno agree to a sit down with Vince McMahon. Bruno said he was reluctant, but on the insistence of his attorney, he agreed to the meeting.

    At the meeting, Bruno said he raised the issue of the fact that McMahon was willing to pay six-and-seven figures to celebrities to make appearances, but only threw scraps at wrestling legends like himself. He told McMahon off during the meeting, and refused to do business together.

    Bruno went on to say that agreeing to take part in the Hall of Fame would betray everything he has said publicly in recent years, and that fans constantly go up to him and support his stance. I made the point that Bret Hart showed that it was possible to take part in the Hall of Fame while still keeping your distance from WWE and endorsing the product. Bruno said the Hall was basically a joke, and pointed out that McMahon even inducted his old limo driver, James Dudley, who he said was a nice guy. He also pointed out the fact that there actually is no physical Hall of Fame – a point he repeats later.

    I agreed that Hall began as a farce, but said that WWE had made strides in legitimizing it over the years. And while some questionable people still get inducted (I singled out Koko B. Ware), it has largely come to be recognized as a fairly prestigious and legitimate Hall of Fame.

    The interview picks up where he again discusses that McMahon paid Mike Tyson "three and a half million dollars" for his WrestleMania XIV appearance.

    Bruno Sammartino: That’s what he got. And then he gives a Killer Kowalski or a Dominic Denucci who spent 30 years in the business $1,000 or $1,500. That’s disrespectful of the people who made this business.

    Alfonso Castillo: Well, what do you say then to the guy who accepts it – to the Dominic Denuccis?

    BS: You mean the money?

    AC: Yeah, I mean certainly a lot of guys are on those legends contracts. They make appearances for WWE. They’ll be happy to take that money. Are they somehow selling themselves out by associating themselves with WWE?

    BS: Oh, no. I don’t judge anybody as far as that goes because I don’t know what their finances are. I don’t if they really need to or if they’re in need of being seen with the crowds or whatever. I don’t know what their motivations are because I certainly don’t question any of them and I’ve never asked them for any reason. I think it’s insulting and, personally, I would never do it. They gave guys like Pete Rose, I understand, three or four hundred thousand dollars and some other football players and show biz characters hundreds of thousands of dollars. And he’s going to give a wrestler $2,500, $2,00, maybe $2,500. Personally – and I’ve never said it because I don’t want to judge anybody – but I’d say shame on them for letting them getting away with that kind of garbage.

    AC: But, for some of these guys, who else is going to give them $2,500?

    BS: Can I tell you something? His (Vince McMahon Jr.’s) father had me blackballed all over the country. I had to go back to Pittsburgh and be a ditch digger because I had a wife and a kid. And you know why? Because I wouldn’t give in to them and their demands. Finally – six or seven months later – I wound up in Canada. That’s where I got my break – all through Canada, where I spent almost two years. And then they were kissing my behind when they heard about my success in Canada to come back to New York. And when I did come back to New York, I came on my own terms. So, nobody was more broke than I was at that time. I didn’t have two nickels to rub together, but I still wouldn’t give in to them, because I knew I was right and I knew they were wrong.

    AC: Do you feel kind of the same now?

    BS: Absolutely. I would feel like a prostitute if I gave in to McMahon.

    AC: Well, again, this is maybe where I differ with you – the whole issue of ‘giving in’ to McMahon. I understand what you’re getting at, but I don’t know that it would be a matter of associating yourself with Vince McMahon. You couldn’t foresee a way where you could do both – where you could show up to the Hall of Fame…?

    BS: I told McMahon this: "You want me in there? You really do, huh? Show me the respect you showed the non-wrestling people." The Mike Tysons, the Pete Rose, and these other ball players that he used and show biz people. Show me the kind of respect you showed those people and I’ll consider it.

    AC: Well, what you’re talking about there is money. Because I can’t imagine that you think that Mike Tyson and Pete Rose were shown more respect than a lot of names that were inducted into the Hall of Fame in recent years – the Ric Flairs, or the Funks, Fred Blassie, Pedro Morales. Those people were certainly treated with more respect than Mike Tyson. I’m sure they didn’t make nearly the money that they paid Mike Tyson. So is it an issue of money for you?

    BS: No, it’s not just for the money. It shows that he would value me or some other of the guys. He should value us at least as much as them, but in reality, he should value us a hell of a lot more than them, because those guys never contributed anything to this business. I’ve had three major back surgeries. I’ve had hip replacement. I’ve had knee surgery. I broke my neck in 1976. I came within a millimeter of being paralyzed from the waist down. And now this guy thinks he’s going to get me to a Hall of Fame for a couple thousand bucks?

    AC: Well, can I ask you, did he ever offer you a figure? Was there ever a figure floated for doing business with him?

    BS: For the Hall of Fame he offered $5,000.

    AC: Really?

    BS: Yeah. That’s pretty awful.

    AC: Wow. That is on the low end. Well, did they ever discuss anything with you – like a DVD or anything like that?

    BS: Well, what I think he told my attorney was… Because I don’t trust him for nothing, I said, "If you want to do a DVD, if you want to do whatever, fine. Let’s work out a deal that is satisfactory financially, and then go out and sell it to make all they money in the world. If you make tens times more than me, fine." But, because I don’t trust them, "Give me the money up front and then you take the chance worldwide about selling that DVD." Because, let me tell you something about what he did. He sold some of my merchandise, which he had to pay me for. He has copyrights, but he can’t just use you. What we figured out, and I told him this when I saw him, he gave me less than one-tenth of one percent of the sales.

    AC: Is that right?

    BS: Yeah. And you know why I couldn’t do anything about it, the lawyers told me? Because when he gave me the first check when I was still there doing some commentary, I cashed it. Once I cashed it, it was like a contract. I agreed to that. To this day, when they sell stuff and I look at the breakdown, I don’t even get one-tenth of one percent of what they sell of me.

    AC: I just can’t help but think that – and I don’t know Vince McMahon – but certainly I think it’s important enough to WWE and to the McMahon family to legitimize their Hall of Fame that I would suspect that they would be able to go the extra mile, within reason, to get you into it. And I’m sure – I mean, I could picture the day that you would be inducted – I think the place would absolutely explode. You’re one of the most important people in the history of the business.

    BS: You just don’t know McMahon. He has to win. And if he gives in by giving you what you’re asking for, then he will have lost in his own warped mind. That’s how the guy works. And let me tell you about my achievements. You mentioned Hulk Hogan. There is the biggest myth in the history of professional wrestling. This guy could never sell out arenas. Vince McMahon found out early when he tried to put him in back-to-back shows that the gates always drop from the first show to the second show by about 30 percent, or whatever. He’s the luckiest guy that ever came in here, because if you look at his record of the arenas he’s appeared in, he gets credits for stuff he had nothing to do with. Do you know that he even took credit for selling out Shea Stadium when I wrestled Zbyszko?

    AC: Right, and he wrestled Andre.

    BS: And he was a nobody then.

    AC: But you can’t say that Hulk Hogan was not a draw.

    BS: No, he was not a draw.

    AC: Oh, stop.

    BS: Wait a minute. He was a draw for an appearance. Absolutely he was a draw. But he was not a guy that you could bring back show after show to the same arena.

    AC: I mean, the business has changed so much that drawing, I think as you said, means something different than when you were wrestling. Arenas are only a small part of the business now. I don’t think there’s ever been a bigger arena draw than you. What was your record of Garden sell-outs?

    BS: I headlined Madison Square Garden 211 times. When they did the "greatest sports legends," I was the only one they would do, because they did a little investigating. I don’t know how many times I sold out Boston or all the other arenas because they don’t keep those records. These people checked it out and they came back with the report that I headlined the Garden 211 times and had 187 sell-outs. And even in McMahon’s magazine they did a big story – without my permission, but I don’t care about that. That’s their right to do – and they even quoted all these numbers. I remember when the father said, "Hey, we have to take advantage of this, because it’s a tremendous feat." In Boston, for example, I wrestled about 200 time. Do you know that Hulk Hogan never headlined Madison Square Garden more than 20 times in his whole career?

    AC: Well, he wasn’t that full time, right? They’d have the B-shows and they’d have someone else headlining, and Hogan was sort of the special attraction.

    BS: No, no, no. They tried him. I told McMahon it wasn’t going to work, and I laughed at him. I said, "This guy is so limited. He will draw you a crowd when he goes places he hasn’t been. But if you put him in the Garden this month, and then next month, and the next month, and the next month… both he and the Garden will both die, because he is so limited as far as wrestling skills and talent that there’s no way he can carry any club." He can’t. Look, he was the top guy with Time Warner (WCW), and that was the year that they lost $95 million.

    AC: Is there anybody from the modern era that you would consider a draw to the point that you were a draw, like a Steve Austin?

    BS: No, because I look at the arenas, not what they claim they did in merchandise.

    AC: Well, even the arenas. I think Steve Austin sold out tons of arenas during his run.

    BS: No, they may have sold out one time around, but they never could come back and sell out. The big draws were (Antonino) Rocca – if you remember that name – before me. He was a draw. Verne Gagne throughout Minnesota always drew very, very well. You had guys like Ray Stevens out of California. Kowalski was a draw. Dick the Bruiser was a draw. These were guys that continually came to the same arenas and did big business. That’s a draw. Not somebody that you publicize like crazy and you bring him in for one show and it sells out. But then when you bring him back for the next show, it drops 30 or 40 percent, and then you pull him out of there altogether and go to a different joint because you can’t keep going with this one. And Steve Austin was like that. So was the Rock. None of them were consistent enough that McMahon could maintain the arena. That’s why they’re not at the arenas.

    AC: Again, I think part of the issue is how much the business model changed. But would you dispute that Steve Austin and the Rock in their time, and Hulk Hogan in his time, were the anchors and the centerpieces of two of WWE’s biggest boon periods in its history?

    BS: I call that the drug era, because that’s when all the freaks came in with the drugs and the vulgarity. Here’s – what’s his name – Austin. Here he was in the ring. My kid calls me up. He says, "Hey dad, put on the TV." This was years ago. He was the world champion. He’s got a can of beer. He’s standing in the ring. And on television they’re bleeping out every other word because he’s using the foulest of language. And they show the camera, and I see in the audience – I call them stupid parents with their six and seven and eight year old children witnessing this. The Vince McMahon "kiss my butt club." I’m sure you’ve heard of this. And they’re stupid parents were exposing their children to this. Boy, is that sending wonderful messages. Because when you have young kids and you take them to these places and they do this kind of behavior, obviously these kids must think it mustn’t be bad. It must be acceptable behavior, right? Well, this is what McMahon turned wrestling into. And excuse me if I don’t want any part of that or would have anything to do with that. And you can credit Steve Austin or the Rock or whoever else you want to credit, but they were all part of that garbage. Every one of them. And the drugs. Look at all the wrestlers that have died from drugs.

    AC: No, I understand where you’re coming from. Would you say that your era of wrestling was more family-friendly?

    BS: Mine? Absolutely. You never heard anything about…

    AC: Well, not about drugs, but I remember lots of violence. I remember a lot of blood. I remember Lou Albano shoving a spike in somebody’s head.

    BS: But don’t you see violence when you see football? Don’t you see violence when you see hockey?

    AC: Well, you can make the same argument about the kind of stuff Steve Austin was doing. Beer drinking and that kind of thing. That’s all part of popular culture.

    BS: Do you they have to use the F-word and everything else and guzzle beer on television for everyone to see? That’s the same thing? Tell me what other athletes you see doing interviews and using the words "F this" and "mother-F this" and all that kind of stuff.

    AC: Well, part of the issue is that it’s not pure sports, right? It’s hard to compare WWE with the NFL or something like that.

    BS: Well, I thought of myself in my era as much tougher than the sports that you mentioned. I’ll tell you why. We used boxing rings in my era, and those things were like concrete, my friend. And there was no padding in our bodies. And people can say we knew how to land, but when you’re getting bodyslammed or you’re taking back body drops and you come down seven feet, that’s not knowing how to land. You have to come down and land on that thing. There were no mats outside the ring. There were just concrete floors when you flew over the top rope. That’s why if you see some of the old timers today, you see them in wheel chairs, you see them in crutches, you see them in those walkers, whatever you call them, canes, because eof the abuse. You see, when we got hurt, it wasn’t like football or baseball when you go on the rehab. The promoters didn’t do that. They treated you like a dog. If you didn’t wrestle, you didn’t get paid. "You’re hurt? Your tough luck."

    AC: But, that’s not good, right? (laughs)

    BS: No, it’s not good.

    AC: I mean, that’s bad. That the sport has evolved a little from that, I’d imagine is a good thing. Do you wish that there weren’t mats outside of the ring? At the end of the day, what professional wrestling is is simulated violence. In an ideal world, you shouldn’t be getting hurt.

    BS: Well, let me tell you something. If you see me, you’ll see pretty nasty cauliflower ears. And I will show you a lot of guys from my era that have cauliflower ears and other things. Show me one of these guys today that have cauliflowered ears or anything like that.

    AC: Well, why should they?

    BS: They’re not wrestlers.

    AC: Well, the sport’s changed a lot.

    BS: Well, OK, the sport’s changed. And that’s why I don’t belong in it and that’s why I don’t want to have anything to do with it. It’s not my world.

    AC: Well, nobody’s telling you to go wrestle. But I know from what I hear from fans, and myself, everyone would love to see you get your day in the sun there at the Hall of Fame. Even if it was the only time we ever saw you there, I know it would make a lot of fans happy to see you up there at the Hall of Fame. Forgetting about whether you’d be agreeable to it or not, if you were inducted into the Hall of Fame do you think that the ceremony, the video package that they would put together for you, the words that they would speak before they’d call you on stage – Do you envision all of that being respectful, or do you think it would be disrespectful and they would use the opportunity to somehow undercut you?

    BS: I don’t know how they could be disrespectful. They can’t show any videos of me being vulgar in any way whether it be with my language or my behavior or anything like that. All they could show is different matches that I had. They might show some matches that maybe weren’t as good as I would have liked (laughs).

    AC: No, my question is – Do you question whether they would handle your Hall of Fame induction in a respectful manner?

    BS: They would have to, because I would get that microphone. And if they did anything that wasn’t respectful, believe you me, the whole world would hear about it, because I’d have my own time in front of that microphone to say what I would have to say.

    AC: Have you watched any of the Hall of Fame inductions in recent years?

    BS: No, I never watch any wrestling. Like I said, the only reason I watched Steve Austin that time was because he was guzzling the beer and bleeping out every other word. Somebody called it to my attention. I don’t want to watch it because it disgusts me.

    AC: I can’t help but think that you might misunderstand a little bit what these Hall of Fame ceremonies look like. I’m not at all being a shill for WWE, and I’ve got loads of problems with what they do. I really do, and I call them out on it all the time. But I do think the Hall of Fame is one night of the year where they kind of give back. And it’s a real nice thing to sit in the building and watch a lot of the old timers – guys from your era – put on their Sunday best, dress up in their tuxedoes, and gather around. Guys from your era go up there and they tell a lot of great war stories from their day. You’ve got hundreds or wrestlers from the new generation dressed up and all ears, wide-eyed, listening these stories and paying respect to the guys who have paved the way, like yourself. It’s just like the one night of the year when all the nonsense is removed and it just really kind of pays respect and tribute to the pioneers, like yourself. And if you watched the way they put these video together, and the words that are spoken – these Hall of Fame induction speeches and the people who go up there – it’s really moving. It’s almost moving to tears, how well it’s put together. And whenever I’ve seen those, every year it happens, it’s like, "I wish they would do this for Bruno. If any one deserves this, Bruno deserves this." It’s part of the reason why I argued they should do this whether Bruno cooperates or not. Because, fans should see this. Fans should be reminded of the contributions Bruno Sammartino made.

    BS: I don’t think the fans need that to know the contributions. Because when I make personal appearances, it’s all that I ever hear from the fans. "Bruno, you were my hero growing up."

    AC: But, those are your fans. Those are the people who know you and are going out of their way to see you. There are millions of new fans who have never seen a Bruno Sammartino match and might not appreciate what an important piece of history you are, and should be reminded of it.

    BS: (Pause) Well, you know, we can go round and round and round (laughing).

    AC: I’m trying to convince you here! I’m thinking it’s not going to work.

    BS: No, it’s not going to work. Because, for one thing, you don’t know me. You know how I looked at wrestling? I looked at wrestling as a job – as a way to make living for my family and to try to give them a better life than I had known as a kid, coming from Europe and being there during the War – all that hell that we went through. The other thing that drove me was the fact that I was headliner and people left their homes and drove their cars to get to the arena, pay for the parking, buy the ticket to come in. I’ve always felt extremely indebted to go out there and give it your 110 percent, because you owe it to them. Because they went way out of their way, and they are responsible for you being a so-called star. Because these idiots who think they’re superstars, they’re dreamers. Because without those fans, you are nothing. And the fans decide whether I’m going to be a superstar or I’m going to be just another jabroni on the card. Those were my two things, and I fell I accomplished that. There were many times where I’ve gone in the ring with a cracked rib, with a broken finger and I would tape it to the other finger. And, unfortunately, on those occasions, even though you did the best you could, I felt at times depressed because I felt the fans did not get their money’s worth on that particular night. But when I was on, when everything was OK, I’d go out there and I’d bust my butt for those fans, because that was the least that I could do for them. So when I got out of the business, I felt good. I felt that the business had been good to me, as far as the fans. And I know I gave the best I had to give to the fans, and nothing else mattered after that. I didn’t care about no Halls of Fames. I didn’t care about getting all kinds of praises or whatever. That kind of stuff was never a big deal for me. It never, never was, and it still isn’t today.

    AC: Well, I wish you’d keep an open mind, at least. I know at the end of the day, it should be about your decision. But I do think fans benefit from something like that. I was in Orlando last year when Ric Flair was inducted into the Hall of Fame. And I know that for me, and the thousands of other fans that were in the building, it’s a great memory for us. It’s like we were able to witness this great piece of history. And it’s sort of fulfilling and satisfying for fans who have invested so much into these characters and into these personas to get to see them get their day. I think there are legions of Bruno Sammartino fans that would like to see that. They would like to have that moment.

    BS: And there are also many, many fans – because I run into them every time I Make an appearance – who would, "Oh, for God’s sake. If there was a guy who I never thought would sell out, it would be Bruno. And he just sold out."

    AC: I can almost assure you that those very same fans would be trying to buy a ticket (to the ceremony.) They’d be watching on TV. They’d have tears in their eyes. They’d have their best tuxedo on and they’d be giving you a standing ovation the moment you went up there. And again, I go back to Bret Hart. I mean, if anybody ever had a reason not to work with WWE again. And he’s been pretty consistent about it. He hasn’t really done much of anything with them. He worked with them in putting out a DVD a couple of years ago. But he’s kept his distance from them, and really did kind of sever that bond. But he showed up for the Hall of Fame, and he gave maybe the best speech in the history of the Hall of Fame, and got a really nice ovation. Very respectful. The next night, they do WrestleMania, and they like to bring out the inductees from the previous night out into the arena. He didn’t come out. He said, "I was here for the Hall of Fame, and nothing else. I’m not going to participate in anything else." And he hasn’t. And I don’t think anybody thinks Bret Hart sold out.

    BS: I don’t want to say whether he sold out or not. That’s up to him and his own feelings, or conscience, or whatever. But just because he did what he did – He was interviewed and he said that he felt that I was wrong that I don’t go in it. Well, gee whiz. Before he went in, he felt so right about not going in. And then he changed his mind.

    AC: I don’t know if that’s true. I remember him saying – and I’m not sure of this – but I’m pretty sure he said, even when he was at his angriest and right after the whole situation in Montreal, I’m pretty sure what he said was, "I’ll never go back. The only way I’ll ever go back is for the Hall of Fame, and that’s it." He felt he had earned that, and he wasn’t going to let a personal dispute with Vince McMahon take this away from him.

    BS: Again, Vince McMahon was interviewed – and I didn’t see this for myself, because I never watch that – but he was interviewed by somebody… and the question was – and you may have heard this. I hope you did, because I’ve had many people tell me who said that they actually saw the interview – they said to McMahon, "Well, you know, you have this Hall of Fame every year. We heard rumors that you might be building a building in Connecticut for the Hall of Fame." And he kind of snickered and said, in other words, it’s "an illusion" of a Hall of Fame. He admitted it.

    AC: Well, that’s the least of it – whether there’s a piece of real estate that’s called the Hall of Fame. That doesn’t take away the fact that there are some people who have been singled out because of their accomplishments. Whether there’s a place to visit – yeah, they probably should do that. But I don’t see that as any kind of deal breaker. Maybe they’ll one day they will get to do it.

    BS: So you believe that if I don’t go into the Hall of Fame my accomplishments will not count?

    AC: Oh, absolutely not. No, of course not. But it’s just – I don’t know. And I’ll be completely honest that I’m being selfish here, not just on the behalf of myself, but sort of speaking the average wrestling fan – and all of us speaking selfishly – there’s very much that mentality among wrestling fans of, "God, I’d really like to see Bruno go in. That would be really cool."

    BS: And, like I say, most of the ones tell me – they pat me on my back and they say, "I really respect you for sticking to your guns."

    AC: But, you know what? I really think to some extent you have to take that with a grain of salt. Because, of course they’re going to tell you that, you know? That you’re sticking to your guns. But really, I don’t know how to quantify it, but I can almost assure you that 100 times more people would like to see it than the some people who go up to you and say, "Don’t do it." Because, I’ll write these posts on Newsday and every year around that time we discuss who should get into the Hall of Fame. And it always starts with Bruno Sammartino, and then it’s everybody else. It’s always, "When are they going to get Bruno Sammartino in?"

    BS: Well, do you remember that documentary that they did? It was a two-hour long documentary about pro wrestling?

    AC: On A&E with Steve Allen? Yeah.

    BS: Did you hear my name mentioned there one time?

    AC: No, and I agree… But that’s 13 years ago.

    BS: Do you know why it wasn’t mentioned?

    AC: Because you don’t get along (with McMahon).

    BS: Because McMahon demanded it. How do I know that? Because A&E got so much reaction (from people saying) "How the heck could you do a documentary of professional wrestling, and Bruno Sammartino, who dominated it for almost 20 years, wasn’t even mentioned?" They got so much on that that what happened was that A&E called me up and they wanted to come to Pittsburgh to do five minutes – actually I don’t know how long – to get all that off their back. A woman called and told me that they would love to do this, that they would come to Pittsburgh with their crew. And I said to her, even though I knew everything, I played it dumb and I said to her, "Wait a minute. You just did a documentary - two hours on professional wrestling. My name wasn’t even mentioned once. So how could I be so important to you that you would want to come here with a crew to do an interview or whatever it is that you’re after with me. You didn’t see me as worthy to be part of that history of wrestling." And she, more or less said, "Believe me, it wasn’t that we weren’t interested. The circumstances…" I said, "Please, be big enough to admit to me that McMahon didn’t want my name mentioned. Because if you didn’t agree to that, he wouldn’t have given you film clips, he wouldn’t have given you all that stuff." She never said, "yeah," but she more or less said, "Well, you know. What can I say?" And I said, "I don’t know what you can say, but I know what I can say. You can stick your crew and your members and your story you want to do and shove it lady, because I’m not interested." And then I closed the phone.

    AC: I certainly think there was a long period of time there when Vince McMahon and WWE forgot its history and wouldn’t acknowledge it. I do think a lot’s changed though.

    BS: You know why it’s changed? Because it backfired on them, that’s why.

    AC: Yeah. I think there was a lot of resentment. You’re right. And I think there was a lot of fans saying let’s not act like these people didn’t exist. But you look at WWE’s 24/7 On Demand channel, where your matches are on all the time, and the MSG Classics show that they do over the summer, and the action figures.

    BS: But don’t think McMahon does that because he wants to publicize Bruno. He puts on there what sells and what’s going to make him money.

    AC: Well, I think you’re answering your question. That’s just it. He knows that you’re important and that putting a Bruno Sammartino match on in the New York market is going to get some viewers.

    BS: If he can make money from it – just like he does with the Hall of Fame and everything else. He sells it to 126 countries where they sell the DVDs from the Hall of Fame and all that. And what does he give the wrestlers who come into to the Hall of Fame? He throws them a bone. But then he can be so generous to people who never contributed anything to professional wrestling, who even make fun of it and joke about it. And to them he can show his generosity and what a big, big man he is in professional wrestling.

    AC: Well, I agree that if what they offered you is $5,000, that’s absurd. I agree. But I wish you guys could arrive at some sort of deal. I think there’s a lot of money to be made in a Bruno Sammartino DVD compilation.

    BS: But you wouldn’t see it. Look, look. It’s not just a question of the money. I don’t know if maybe you’re not understanding me. It’s not a question of money, and Bruno’s money hungry because he wants a lot of money. No. It’s because he can’t have his way. I will refuse to have him have his way. When I say treat me with respect like you did with Tyson and all these guys, it’s because he gave millions of dollars to Tyson, hundreds of thousands of dollars to other guys. But yet, he’s such a – whatever he is – that he wants Bruno bad, but he wants him on his own terms, because then he wins all the way around. You have to know this guy’s mentality. If it’s so important to him, why doesn’t he do this? Say, "Here, I tell you what Bruno. To show that I want to be fair, you have an attorney, we have our attorney. We’ll draw a contract where you’ll get X amount of dollars up front and then you’ll get 20 percent" – and I’m just using numbers here. He won’t do that. Because then he’s meeting your demands and he feels like you win and he loses. You have to know McMahon. You guys just don’t know this guy. I’ve known him for forty-something years. You guys just don’t know him. You just don’t know how his mind works.

    AC: I certainly know the stories, and I certainly believe what you’re saying about that at the end of the day he’s got to win.

    BS: And he ain’t going to win with me. I’m sorry is some fans are going to be disappointed. Gee I’m sorry.

    AC: I don’t know if there’s a way that maybe you could meet half way – again, just speaking for the fans who would like to see it.

    BS: With him, there’s no half way. There’s no half way with McMahon.

    AC: Well, I wonder just because they’re running out of guys to induct. That Hall of Fame pretty much has got everybody who needs to be in it except for a few guys. The couple other guys who they’ve said they’d never do business with – Randy Savage – they just put out a DVD with him. You wonder if they’ll get him in the Hall of Fame. Bob Backlund apparently they’ve been talking to.

    BS: I don’t even know what problem they have with Bob Backlund.

    AC: I don’t know if there is one, but for some reason he hasn’t gotten in, and he sort of stands out as somebody who should have been in a long time ago. But they put something up recently on their web site about him – a big, long story. So you’d think they’re at least on speaking terms. If they do Savage and they do Backlund – who are both well below you, I think – that’s it. It’s all about Bruno. It’s the one glaring, big, black mark on the Hall of Fame. Bruno Sammartino isn’t in it, and until he is, it’s not quite legitimate.

    BS: Well you know what then? If that’s the case – what you’re saying that all that’s left is Bruno – then let him recognize that and let him come forward and be fair about the whole thing.

    AC: Well, then let’s pose it this way. If McMahon was fair about it, and approached you in a respectful manner with a fair deal, would be able to do business with him.

    BS: I’d say very possibly. Possibly. It would have to be something that we’d both have to give and take some. You know what I mean? I can’t give you specifics right now. It’s something you’d really have to think about. But I would never say to you, "No, it’s impossible." I would say – I don’t know. There would have to be a lot of stuff that would have to be straightened out and we’d have to talk about."

    AC: Would any terms of you having any kind of business arrangement with WWE require some changes to their product?

    BS: Yeah, because here’s another thing. And maybe you’re one of those who believes that McMahon is trying very hard to change to become more kid-friendly, because I’ve heard those terms lately. But what a lot of people don’t know is that there have been a lot of pressures from the sponsors who have been getting a lot of negativity from the fans and some of them dropped out. And they picked up other sponsors, but not with the same amount of money. And I understand that some of the stations were getting a lot of pressure and who were, in turn, coming down on McMahon and saying, "Hey, you’ve got to make changes because we’re getting a lot of flack here and we can’t do this." My point to you is that it’s not McMahon who would change a darn thing if it were up to him. Only if he’s pressured by the advertisers and by the stations. McMahon himself would go even lower than he’s done, and I don’t know how you can go lower than burying people alive, crucifying somebody, or running people over with cars in parking lots. I don’t know, but he has always managed to find something even lower than what he’s done before. So this is not McMahon that’s changing in any shape or form. It’s the pressure that’s being put on McMahon. And a lot of people don’t know that and maybe don’t really believe that this is the guy. "Oh, no, no. It’s Vince – Vince wants to become more kid-friendly and more family-friendly and all that." That’s such nonsense. It’s ridiculous. It’s such nonsense. It’s pressure that’s being put on him.

    AC: Well, I agree with that. And at the end of the day it’s about what will make the most money. And I think if, tomorrow, he thought that the opportunity to make the most money would be with a family-friendly, cleaned-up product, then he would do that. I don’t know that he’s loyal to any particular brand of wrestling. I think he’s going to do what he thinks will maximize viewership. Because, you know, he did the family-friendly route for a long time.

    BS: Not really. But let me tell you something about how we all knew about McMahon and his brains. When he was commentating with me – I don’t know how far back you go, but for a while, while I was wrestling I was also doing commentating from 1978 to 1981. And he and I were doing to commentating out of Allentown and Hamburg for all our TVs. And anyway, the guys used to talk privately and say, Holy smokes. I wonder what the heck… Can you imagine what would happen if the old guy dies and this guy takes over?" Everybody saw (it.) They’d say, this guy – he’s not normal. They guys used to say this. So when he became a promoter, we saw what direction he took it. And he had some powerful help from guys like Dick, what’s his name?

    AC: Ebersol?

    BS: Dick Ebersol, to really open doors for him, and other people. It enabled him to really go nationwide and run opposition to the other promoters. Eventually, he killed it for himself and for other promoters, because nobody then could draw the houses anymore because all the crap that took place at the time. And he put everybody out of business.

    AC: Yeah, but he did it all the way to the bank, right? It’s sort of hard to argue, to some extent, with his tactics.

    BS: Well, he fed his pocket, but how many wrestlers did he put out of business? When you had 25, 30 territories, do you know how many wrestlers you had at the time? Go from that day to now, and see how many wrestlers are out there.

    AC: Yeah, but the ones who are employed are probably making more money than they would have otherwise, right?

    BS: There’s no question about it. There’s a few who made more money than guys like me, who were on top for a long time, could ever imagine.

    AC: What’s the biggest year you had money-wise?

    BS: $250,000. That’s it. But, in all honesty, I was very grateful.

    AC: That’s a lot of money, when you’re taking about the 60’s and 70’s.

    BS: For me that was a lot, because when you talk about my background, being in Europe during the war and all that kind of stuff, to me I couldn’t believe that I could be in that bracket. Now, I realize in comparison to today it was pocket change. But for me, I was very, very grateful. I didn’t make the kind of money that today I have money to burn. But my kids are all grown. It’s just me and my wife. We live in the same home where we’ve lived for quite a few years. And we’re comfortable. I go back to the Old Country. We just had our 50th anniversary and we celebrated in Europe. So, you know, we’re not people that need a whole lot, you know what I mean? So believe me, I’m not jealous of anybody because I’m happy where I’m at at this stage if my life. So money isn’t the big issue. It’s the principal.

    AC: I understand. I certainly agree that you deserve all the respect in the world. Hopefully one day Vince McMahon will appreciate that and will approach you respectfully and give you your just due. Again, just as a fan, I’d love to see it happen. My father is getting up there…

    BS: Your father?

    AC: Yeah, my father watched you wrestle a bunch of times.

    BS: Where are you from again?

    AC: I live in New York. I grew up in the Bronx, and my dad came to New York from Nicaragua in the 1950’s and would go watch you all the time in the Garden.

    BS: Well, yeah, I was going to say that if your dad was from that era, ask him how many times Bruno Sammartino headlined Madison Square Garden. Ask him how many were near within a fraction of headlining the Garden.

    AC: Yeah, and it would be a neat thrill for me in my father’s lifetime to watch you be inducted to the Hall of Fame, alongside my dad.

    BS: Well, go have a talk with Vince McMahon.

  • More on Hogan in TNA, Raw ratings, Survivor Series and more

     

     I’m just getting back from a much-needed vacation, so forgive the lack of recent posts. I hope to get back on track with regular posts, and finally putting up my interview with Bruno Sammartino in which we debated the notion of him accepting an invitation to be inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame.

    Seeing as how it’s been a while since I’ve dropped by here, I thought I’d use this post to cover a lot of ground.

    . First of all, let me address the pink elephant in the room. The odds are that a large segment of the readership of this blog – perhaps even the majority – no longer has free access to Newsday.com. Unless you are a Newsday subscriber or an Optimum Online customer – which should cover much of Long Island – the only way you can fully access Newsday.com now is by paying $5.99 a week.

    While the majority of this site’s content targets local readers here on Long Island, I’d like to think that my little corner of this site appealed to a broader audience of wrestling fans who are not necessarily from the region. I am saddened to lose those readers, but I will continue to try to provide news, insight and other entertaining features for those of you who are still here.

    . I touched upon the big news of Hulk Hogan signing with TNA when the story broke about two weeks ago. A lot more is known about the story now, and judging from Dixie Carter’s self righteous address to the TNA locker room on Impact a couple weeks ago, Hogan’s signing may be just the tip of the iceberg as far as the changes that are in store for TNA.

    For my money, none of this is good news, and the more time passes, the less I have confidence that Dixie Carter has any idea what she is doing. I don’t doubt that, as she said in her speech, she’s had a lot of people telling her how to run a wrestling company over the years. Unfortunately, she has seemingly ignored the advice of those who actually knew what they were talking about (Jim Cornette) and has embraced the input of the one person who may know the least.

    Hulk Hogan has no real intention of fixing TNA, and even if he did, he wouldn’t know how to do it. If some of Hogan’s comments to the media in recent weeks are any indication, his ideas for what would work in the wrestling business are incredibly out of touch and unrealistic. He’s mentioned Randy Savage, Steve Austin and Rob Van Dam as three people he thinks could change TNA. Those three names alone tell you all you need to know about how much Hogan has kept up with the sport. Savage is pushing 60, and the last time we saw him he looked like a frail, old man. Austin hasn’t wrestled in six years, and would have no intention to do so in a second rate company. I imagine Hogan threw in RVD as his "young, hip" draft pick, but even Van Dam is nearly 40 and hasn’t meant anything in the sport in three years.

    More realistically, the Hogan-era TNA will feature the likes of longtime Hogan cronies like Brutus Beefcake and the Nasty Boys. I’m sure Vince McMahon is shaking in his boots.

    Dixie Carter’s biggest obstacle in running a successful wrestling promotion is that she doesn’t know what she doesn’t know. And so she continues to rely on the advice of con men with seemingly impressive resumes who withhold much of the story about their legacies in the wrestling business. Yes, Eric Bischoff, Hulk Hogan and TNA head writer Vince Russo were all integral parts of the biggest boon periods in wrestling history. But, arguably, they were even bigger parts of its biggest collapse, in the form of WCW.

    Not to put too much blame for the company’s shortfalls on the feet of one person, but the fact is, until Dixie Carter fires Vince Russo, there is zero reason to believe that TNA has any realistic chance of growing substantially in the future. Russo’s vision for TNA is so undisciplined, sophomoric, and bankrupt of all the tenets of basic storytelling, that until he goes, TNA has no hope.

    Beside the fact that the segment was completely unnecessary and over the heads of the majority of TNA’s audience, there was something really offensive about Carter’s dressing down of the TNA locker room in her speech a couple weeks back.

    Carter should realize that TNA isn’t struggling because of most of its talent, but in spite of it. With the exception of a few uninspired, middle-aged Monday Night War veterans who are there for a paycheck, TNA’s locker room is filled with some of the most hard working and talented athletes in the sport. Ask anyone who’s ever gone to a TNA house show, and they’ll tell you that they are some of the best nights of live wrestling they’ve ever witnessed. Last night’s Turning Point pay per view is similarly being praised as one of TNA’s best pay per views in a long time thanks to the effort of the conteststants in the two main matches – Kurt Angle, Desmond Wolfe, A.J. Styles, Samoa Joe and Christopher Daniels. But TNA’s wrestlers are constantly being betrayed by a completely inept management team.

    And it’s not going to get any better.

    . WWE announced today that it had reached an agreement with USA to continue airing Raw through 2014. That’s no surprise, as Raw remains one of cable’s top rated shows. According to the press release, Raw’s ratings have increased 11 percent since it started regularly featuring guest hosts.

    There’s no question that the concept has been a ratings success, but you have to wonder if it’s just the proverbial bandage on a larger problem. WWE’s recent earnings report showed big drops in pay per view buys, meaning that while the guest host concept may be attracting some new viewers to its free TV show, it is doing nothing to help sell pay per views. And, perhaps, it’s hurting buy rates by spending too much time focusing on the celebrity hosts, and not enough time hyping matches.

    I’m glad WWE is taking a one-week break from the mainstream celebrity host gimmick and having WWE legend Roddy Piper host tonight’s sold-out Raw from Madison Square Garden. WWE has enough important figures from wrestling’s history at its disposal that it should not feel the need to sign a celebrity each week. What’s more, the WWE legends get the product better than the celebrities, can cut promos with more conviction, and, in some instances, even take some bumps.

    WWE may actually be getting the best of both worlds next week, as it announced today that it has signed WWE Hall of Famer and former Minnesota governor Jesse "The Body" Ventura to host next week’s three hour special Raw. While Ventura may be one of the best color commentators in wrestling history, he can also be quite obnoxious and even embarrassing these days, especially when he does anything with WWE. Next week’s Raw has a good chance of being quite the train wreck, but that may be exactly what WWE is hoping for.

    . The 23rd annual Survivor Series is taking place this Sunday. While the Survivor Series is the second-oldest regular WWE pay per view event, behind only WrestleMania, it’s lost a lot of its luster over the years. Although still considered one of the "Big Four" pay per views – along with Mania, the Royal Rumble and SummerSlam – more and more over the years the Survivor Series, and its traditional tag team elimination matches, has come off as a kind of unavoidable inconvenience to WWE writers.

    Whereas I can still run offf the main matches of every WrestleMania ever, the winners of all the Royal Rumble matches in history, and the main events of just about every SummerSlam, the Survivor Series has become far less memorable in recent years. I recently looked over the results of the last ten years of the event, and had little memory of much of any of it.

    And yet, I can remember the main matches of the first ten years of so of the event, down to the names of the individual teams (The Warriors vs. The Perfect Team at the 1990 edition.)

    It’s obviously a symptom of a much bigger problem of WWE running too many pay per views for any of them to stick out as anything special. Things were a little bit better when WWE was running brand-specific pay per views on alternating months and only the Big Four features matches from all the brands.

    WWE took a small step toward improving things next year by cutting one show from its schedule, but it could still afford to lose at least another one.

    . As for this Sunday’s card, there’s not all that much to be excited about. While WWE still has tonight and Friday night to build toward its two world title matches, the hype has been disappointing so far, with DX being more concerned with making fifth graders chuckle than getting a world title shot this Sunday.

    Always the nostalgia buff, I am looking forward to the traditional team elimination matches. Although WWE hasn’t done much in recent years to build anticipation for these matches, there’s tons of storytelling potential in them – whether it means having one babyface take one four heels, having a match come down to a novel one-on-one encounter, or having a powerful babyface team run roughshod through a heel team and eliminate all of them. There are tons of possibilities. I’d like to see WWE put together a video package on the history of the team elimination matches, just as it has done for the Rumble.

    . The good people at Topps trading cards have asked me to note that their new line of WWE 2009 trading cards are now available at Target, Wal-Mart, Toys "R" US and other retailers. You can check out some of the images of the cards here. I’ve seen some of the cards up close, and they’re pretty cool looking and definitely worth picking up.
     

    . That’s all for now. I’ll try to be by tomorrow with some thoughts on Raw.

     

  • A-Rod on WCW Nitro 11 Years Ago

    In honor of my World Champion New York Yankees, I dug up this video clip from a 1998 episode of WCW Monday Nitro. This was actually the very first time I ever saw A-Rod on television. He was in his fourth year in the big leagues, and playing for the Seattle Mariners.

    This video is kind of surreal, as A-Rod comes out of nowhere and accompanies Konan to the back after a fairly lame mid-card segment involving the forgettable Latino World Order. Part of me thought I dreampt this, until I found the video. Notice how skinny A-Rod looks here. Maybe he got some "nutrition advice" during his visit to the WCW locker room from the likes of Scott Steiner and other jacked up wrestlers.

  • TNA signs Hulk Hogan

     

     

    Total Nonstop Action announced today that it has signed Hulk Hogan to be part of its company.

    Here is the announcement, as published on TNAWrestling.com

    "Hulkamania" is back! The biggest name in professional wrestling history, Hulk Hogan, is joining Total Non-Stop Action Wrestling (TNA), the fastest rising wrestling organization in the world and home to one of cable television’s highest rated shows for young men, TNA iMPACT! The announcement was made today by TNA Wrestling in conjunction with Spike TV at a press conference held in New York City.

    "Hulk Hogan is one of the world’s top pop culture icons and the biggest superstar in the history of professional wrestling. We are truly excited to welcome him into the TNA family," said Dixie Carter, President of TNA Wrestling. "Our goal is to become the world’s biggest professional wrestling company. Hulk defines professional wrestling and we look forward to partnering with him in a variety of ways as we continue to grow TNA globally."

    "I’m thrilled to be jumping back into the world of professional wrestling," said Hogan. "My fans have been asking me to return to the business for many years on a full time basis, but the timing or the opportunity has never been right until now. TNA Wrestling is a great company with an already excellent fan base, business and broadcast partner. I firmly believe now is the time for some change at TNA as they are positioned to jump to the next level in their development and I’m here to work with Dixie to help make that a reality."

    Through Hogan’s partnership with Bischoff Hervey Entertainment Television, the deal with TNA was negotiated by longtime Hogan colleague Eric Bischoff. Additionally, BHE TV has inked a first-look deal with TNA and will be working with the organization to develop new programming extensions of the TNA brand.

    "Hulk Hogan adds yet another level of star power that positions TNA iMPACT as Spike TV’s version of ‘Must-See TV’ on Thursday nights," said Kevin Kay, president of Spike.

    Hogan most recently penned an autobiography with Mark Dagostino, "My Life Outside The Ring" with St. Martin’s Press.

     

    Hogan made the announcement during a press conference here in New York City to promote his new book.

    While it may seem peculiar that TNA would sign Hogan just as TNA President Dixie Carter has launched an initiative to marginalize the role of wrestlign veterans, and push young stars, it’s hard to argue with any wrestling company doing business with Hulk Hogan.

    Quite simply, Hulk Hogan is the biggest star the wrestling business has ever created, and if Vince McMahon could come to a mutually beneficial agreement with Hogan tomorrow, he would.

    I am not so naïve to think that Hogan – nor any single person short of John Cena or the Rock – will have have any noticable impact on TNA, I can certainly understand TNA’s desire to get in bed with Hogan, and perhaps gain a little bit of legitimacy in the main stream media by being affiliated with such a recognizable star.

    How exactly this will work remains to be seen. My guess is that it will be a short-term relationship, and that Hogan’s top priority is to have a national television outlet to promote some of his business ventures, including the book and his forthcoming "Hulkamania" tour of Australia, where he is set to wrestle Ric Flair. Could this mean the Nature Boy may not be too far behind Hogan in joining TNA?

    Along the way, Hogan may "wrestle" a match or two for TNA, but it’s hard to imagine how that would work. A quick glimpse at the TNA roster does not reveal any obvious "dream matches" for Hogan – if you even believe that Hogan could be half of a dream match these days. What’s more, it will require a special kind of wrestler to put something together that even remotely resembles a wrestling match with the 56-year-old Hogan. Shawn Michaels was able to do it four years ago. Kurt Angle may be able to get something watchable out of Hogan, but these days, you have to worry about Angle sacrificing his body to make another wrestler look good.

    Hogan-Sting is old news. Hogan-A.J. Styles wouldn’t mean much to most wrestling fans, but could give Styles some much needed rub. Hogan-Samoa Joe may have meant something four years ago, but TNA has managed to all but completely squander the "next big thing" star power that Joe had when he came to TNA from ROH.

    My bet is that, if Hogan wrestles at all, it will be against Styles in Hogan’s latest "passing of the torch" match.

    But it could very well be that Hogan doesn’t wrestle at all, and rather only shows up for a couple weeks of TV to cut some promos, plug his tour and his book, and collect a paycheck.

    And when it’s all said and done, he will not have made a lick of difference to TNA's business.

  • Thoughts on Bragging Rights, logic holes in Iron Man Match, new WWE title challengers

     

    I’d give Bragging Rights an overall thumbs up as a pay per view, but I’d say the show was actually less than the sum of its parts. What I mean by that is that, while individually several of the matches were quite good, the entire show as a "concept event" never quite clicked. The Raw vs. Smackdown theme seemed forced, and was further hurt by the fact that the night’s two top matches were not inter-brand.

    It’s seemed to me especially peculiar that WWE would replace Cyber Sunday, which I thought was a pretty solid gimmick show (at least until they started charging to vote) with a Raw team vs. Smackdown team concept weeks before the Survivor Series – where such a concept would work better. Now WWE is in the position to either abandon the team match tradition at the Survivor Series, or risk having the show look like a rehash of the previous pay per view. In fact, I’d argue that Survivor Series, with its built-in team format, is probably the better show to do an annual brand vs. brand theme show.

    . I quite liked Batista’s heel turn. As soon as he started threatening Mysterio at the end of the match, it was like something clicked. "Oh, THIS is what Batista was missing." The gimmick of the heel bully immediately fit Batista, and hopefully this will rejuvenate his stagnating career. I’m quite intrigued by the possibilities in a Batista – Mysterio match, as long as Rey is not completely buried in the feud. I don’t mind Batista winning the war against Mysterio. He probably should, if the plan is to make him Smackdown’s top heel. But it’s important that Mysterio come out of the program strong.

    . My thoughts about the night’s 60-minute Iron Man match are similar to those of the pay per view as a whole. While it was consistently entertaining, when I step back and look at it as an entire body of work, it doesn’t quite knock my socks off. That said, I really enjoyed the match, and would certainly have it in the four star range. Just the fact that the match never got boring is quite the accomplishment.

    There had been five previous Iron Man matches in WWE history (only four of which lasted an hour or more.) I have to admit to only remembering three others well –Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels, the Rock vs. Triple-H, and Kurt Angle vs. Brock Lesnar.

    I’d have the Cena-Orton match a notch or two under Brock-Angle, and probably right around Rock-Triple-H. I’ve always thought Bret-Michaels was tremendously over-rated, and the least compelling and entertaining of them all.

    Cena and Orton managed to make the match their own, and told a good story along the way – with both men trading falls until the end. There were some very entertaining and original spots – no the least of which was the simultaneous RKO/Attitude Adjustment. I liked the move, but not so much the overly-cute double pin.

    Unfortunately, the determination to make this match feel as original as possible also led to some very lame spots, and gaping holes in logic. The biggest problem is the same one you often run into you do an "anything goes" match between two arch rivals. And that is the selective use of underhanded tactics by the heel. The lamest spot of the night was obviously Orton’s attempt to blow up Cena with the pyro. As I watched it, all I could think about was, "If Orton is OK with killing Cena to win the match, why not just go back into catering, find a knife, and come back and stab Cena to death?"

    Of course, that sounds ridiculous – but really it’s no more ridiculous than Orton trying to murder Cena with an explosive device. Once you’ve presented the absurd notion that one wrestler is trying to take the life of another, then you are just begging for criticisms of your internal logic.

    Similarly, if Legacy could come out in the mid-way point of the match to attack Cena to help Orton get a pin, why not just be out there for the entire match? And, if anything goes, why bother to respect the rule that you have to give your opponent a 30-second breather after a pinfall. What happens if you don’t? Will you get disqualified – even though the match is no DQ? These are all questions WWE’s writers, and Cena and Orton themselves, should have been asking – because, I assure you, many fans were asking them.

    The biggest problem in the match’s logic came in the finish, when Orton tapped out to the STF with seconds to go on the clock. I know, Orton is the heel and should be presented as gutless, but this didn’t make much sense to me. Assuming Orton knew the match had seconds left – and we saw that he was monitoring the big clock, and fans were counting down – why tap out? The reason wrestlers tap out in matches is that, unless they do, they will continue to be in excruciating pain indefinitely. That was not the case here. Cena was going to let go of the hold in five seconds anyway.

    I suppose I could be convinced that Orton lost track of the time, and didn’t know whether he might be in the hold for several more minutes, but it’s a stretch.

    While the last several paragraphs may give the appearance that I was down on the match, I really wasn’t. In fact, I quite liked having the rare opportunity to appreciate wrestling similar to a real sport – complete with a scoreboard, a time clock, and a point system. I actually watched the pay per view in a room full of people also watching game 6 of the American League Championship Series, and it was amusing when someone would ask "What’s the score?" and I wasn’t quite sure what "game" they were referring to.

    To that end, I appreciated some of the strategy employed by the wrestlers, including Orton sacrificing the first fall so he wouldn’t be stuck in the STF any longer than he had to. Good stuff.

    But we all know what the best thing coming out of Bragging Rights was – no more Cena vs. Orton – at least for the next few months. Both men deserve credit for putting on a series of good to great matches against each other over the last couple of years, but I am not alone in saying that the feud had more than run it’s course.

    And so, it was quite rewarding to see some new, young talent get elevated into the world title picture on Raw last night. You know, fresh faced up and comers who have waited for years to get that big break headlining a WWE show.

    Of course, those men are Triple-H and Shawn Michaels.

    Will WWE ever learn?

  • WWE Bragging Rights preview and predictions

    Been a while since I've done one of these things ... and it's been a while since I've even watched WWE programming ... but I'm trying to get back in the swing of things so I thought I'd do a quick write-up of the newest addition to WWE's PPV schedule, tonight's "Bragging Rights."

    (And while I make no assumptions about where WWE might or might not have gotten this name from, I should point out that former WWE creative team member Chris Gough has been hosting an Emmy-award winning show called "Bragging Rights" on MetroSports Kansas City for years now. I'm just sayin' ...)

    So here we go:

    Seven guys from Raw vs. Seven guys from SmackDown. You know, the single-biggest problem since the brand split in 2002 has been trying to keep the brands unique and separate. "Special matches" like this that see the brands fight each other seem to happen all the time, and I honestly couldn't tell you who's on what show right now. I'm also quite puzzled about why they'd do a match like this just a few weeks out from Survivor Series, since the SS Elimination matches are one of the few things that still hold any value in the current era of 19 PPVs and constant hot-shotting. I just looked at the people in the match and I don't see anyone on the SmackDown side who I think can beat anyone on the Raw side. So I'll pick Raw in the match.

    Iron Man Match: Cena vs. Orton. I know I'm not breaking any new ground by saying this, but does anyone really want to see these two go at it for an hour? And going to my point from earlier, does the Cena stip mean anything? So let's say he loses and goes to SmackDown. Six months after that he'll just be on Raw again, won't he?

    I'd love to see Orton win here. It would put him over as a legit champ, and would send SmackDown another top guy, which they need. Plus, they've already done Cena-Orton in Hell in a Cell, and now Iron Man. They need to get these two as far away from each other as possible.

    (And while we're on the topic of Iron Man matches, am I the only one who thinks the Bret Hart vs. HBK one from WrestleMania XII is the most overrated match in history? The WWE flunkies can put it over all they want, and I'm sure it was a huge physical feat, but zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ...)

    World Title: Taker vs. Mysterio vs. Punk vs. Batista. If Cena winds up going to SmackDown, this match result becomes a lot more interesting. Four-ways usually serve one of two purposes: Either protecting a top guy who's injured and can't work a traditional one-on-one, or switching the title without making the champion look bad. In this case, I think it's a little of both. I'm gonna predict Punk takes the title back here (possibly beating Mysterio). From there, you have a lot of natural match-ups -- Punk/Taker rematch, Punk/Cena, and any number of combinations. Punk is a fresh character who deserves a run.

    John Morrison vs. The Miz: Are both titles on the line here? Oy. Haven't seen much of either but The Miz seems like a charismatic dude. I'll pick him.

    SmackDown divas vs. Raw divas: Don't care.

    Enjoy the show. As usual, I'll be working and watching the Yankees!
     

  • TNA teaches WWE a lesson on how to make a star

     

    Now that’s how you make a wrestling star.

    We don’t get to say this very often, but WWE could learn something from TNA.

    On last night’s edition of Impact, TNA did a better job of creating a new wrestling star right out of the gate than WWE has in seven years. I am speaking of course of the memorable debut of "Desmond Wolfe" – better known to many wrestling fans as former Ring of Honor heavyweight champion Nigel McGuinness.

    In case you hadn’t heard, McGuinness was set to join WWE alongside longtime ROH rival "American Dragon" Bryan Danielson. But weeks after McGuinness and Danielson left ROH a month ago, WWE had still not finalized a deal with McGuinness. Earlier this week, news surfaced that negotiations between McGuinness and WWE fell through, and that TNA seized the opportunity and signed McGuinness out from under WWE.

    Then last night, McGuinness debuted as "Wolfe" in a backstage segment with newly-turned-babyface Kurt Angle. Seconds after humbly introducing himself to Angle, Wolfe attacked the Olympic gold medallist.

    Then in the final segment of the show, Wolfe again came out and attacked Angle at ringside, and then left him laying in the ring after executing his "Tower of London" top turnbuckle neckbreaker (I’m not so sure it’s a good idea for Angle to be taking such a move, but such arguments tend to fall on deaf ears.)

    And sure enough, the Impact following TNA’s biggest pay per view of the year closed with the image of Nigel McGuinness looking dominant in the ring after having destroyed TNA’s biggest star.

    Check out the video below.

    If that’s not a push, I don’t know what is.

    Now, it’s worth bringing this up: Where was TNA when McGuinness was building a reputation as one of the country’s best workers over the last several years? He held the ROH heavyweight title for 15 months, was ranked in the top 10 of the PWI 500 for two consecutive years, and was repeatedly having match of the year contenders on pay per view. Meanwhile, TNA was headlining pay per view after pay per view with broken down Monday Night Wars relics like Booker T and Scott Steiner.

    TNA could have signed McGuinness years ago for relatively little money. But, not surprisingly it took WWE showing interest in McGuinness to make TNA officials (WWE’s biggest fans) take notice.

    While McGuinness may be a little disappointed in not fulfilling his dream of working for WWE, which he grew up watching as a boy, it may very well be a blessing in disguise. Unlike TNA, which is guilty only to being oblivious of McGuinness’ reputation, WWE may have actually held it against him. If we’ve learned anything from Vince McMahon over the years it’s that, unless you became a star in WWE, then you’re not a star.

    There was virtually no chance that McGuinness would be headlining shows in WWE within his first year in the company – if he ever did. More likely, he would have spent months in WWE’s developmental system, "Learning the WWE style," and then be introduced in a relatively small role on WWE, likely on ECW. With some luck, he might be an upper-mid carder in about two years. He’d be in his mid-30s by then.

    It’s WWE’s stubborn insistence that wrestlers who are not related to other wrestler pay their dues that has led to the company’s main event roster being as stagnant as it has in history. The last "star" they created was Jeff Hardy – who was with the company on and off for 15 years before he won his first world title.

    Don’t bring up C.M. Punk, because he’s still not close to the level of a Randy Orton, Batista or John Cena.

    In fact, the last time WWE gave a newcomer the mega-push that McGuinness appeared to get in his TNA debut was when Brock Lesnar arrived in the company in 2002. He was world champion within five months.

    And maybe Brock is the very reason why WWE does not take this tact anymore. After getting pushed to the moon, it turned out that Brock’s heart was not in pro wrestling, and he walked away from WWE after just two years. WWE may have been left gun shy to roll the dice on someone not as invested in the company as say a wrestler with family ties to it.

    But, in all forms of entertainment, the hottest stars don’t arrive in a slow burn. They do so in an explosion.

    The test of whether WWE gets that point may come with their handling of Danielson. In "American Dragon," WWE actually signed, arguably, the hotter of the two ROH free agents. But, as I’ve written before, Danielson will only mean something to WWE if WWE tries to cash in on the reputation he’s built for himself in ROH and on the independent wrestling scene. Without that reputation for being "the best in the world," Danielson is just another short, pale, doughy wrestler.

    None of this is to say that TNA won’t royally screw up their handling of McGuinness. In fact, if you were a betting man playing the odds, I’d bet that they would. But so far, so good.

    I don’t even mind McGuinness’ new name. While I think the name "Nigel McGuinness" is a good one – and comes with a certain amount of credibility built in ROH over several years – I can understand why TNA would want to re-brand McGuinness with a TNA copyrighted name that McGuinness can’t take with him if he decides to leave the company one day. I don’t think it was a situation of TNA trying to ignore McGuinness’ history, especially since they had him tell Angle that he is "currently known as Desmond Wolfe" – suggesting that he was previously known as something else. As far as wrestling names go, I think Desmond Wolfe is a good one. And I can almost guarantee that he would have been saddled with something far worse in WWE. Just ask "Marquis Cor Von" or "Braden Walker." Ugh.

    For the record, I’m not ready to bash WWE for dropping the ball on signing McGuinness. There were widespread reports that McGuinness failed a medical screening conducted by WWE. While McGuinness had denied that in an interview with the Daily Star, I don’t doubt that WWE may have shied away from employing a wrestler with the kind of wear and tear that McGuinness has put on his body in recent years. So while there is no question that McGuinness could have been a big star for WWE, I’d respect there decision not to sign someone with medical issues, if that is indeed true.

    Whatever the case, I can assure you of this much: I’ve just become a much bigger fan of TNA than I was last week. McGuinness has been one of my favorite performers for several years now. And the prospect of an Angle-McGuinness feud – no matter how rushed – is certainly more exciting than just about anything on WWE television right now.

  • Bound For Glory showcased TNA mostly at its best

    I was pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed last night’s TNA “Bound For Glory” pay per view.  The show was good for much the same reason that TNA house shows often receive rave reviews – because it seems TNA’s bookers didn’t get much involved.

    To be fair to Vince Russo and his cronies, the reality is that he was probably very involved in putting together last night’s show – arguably the biggest in the history of the company. And much, like the woman who spends hours putting on make-up just to make it look like she’s not wearing make-up, Russo did a good job making it feel like he took the night off.

    While there were no match of the year candidates last night, nor any jaw-dropping surprises or angles, there were also no pull your hair out, bang your head against the wall, mind numbingly-stupid booking decisions that are usually par for the course for TNA. As such, this was one of the company’s better shows in some time,

    First off, TNA deserves an A for the build up to this show, which included some UFC-inspired promotional packages in which wrestlers gave serious, sit-down interviews about the importance of the show and of their matches. Heading into this show, TNA’s video production team did some of its very best work – and the graphics showcasing the various matches on wind-rippled banners looked top-notch.

    As well, TNA did a very good job of making the Irvine, CA crowd look great on TV. When I attended TNA’s Hard Justice pay per view last year in Trenton, it was rather sad that TNA had to literally hide about 75 percent of the mostly-empty arena from the camera’s view. It didn’t look like that was the case last night. I’m sure the UCI Bren Events Center was far from full, but TNA’s production team did a nice job of making the crowd look good on TV. I’d guess there were a good 5,000 fans in the building, which is quite respectable.

    Most of the night’s matches delivered on the high side of expectations. And while I’m usually the first to criticize TNA for relying to heavily on gimmick matches, on a pay per view billed as the biggest in TNA’s history, the special stipulations did mostly add – and not take away – from the show. Of course, they would all have meant so much more if TNA used the gimmicks more sparingly. I can’t believe TNA was up to its 17th Ultimate X match. That’s just pathetic. I couldn’t name you the winners of more than two or three of them.

    The Ultimate X is a great concept that TNA came up with, and the company should do more to protect it – similar to how WWE has (at least until recent months) protected some of its top gimmick matches, like Hell in a Cell or TLC, by only breaking them out once a year.

    That said, the Ultimate X is beyond dangerous – and not the fun, tongue-in-cheek kind of dangerous that is inherent in Hell in a Cell or the Elimination Chamber. I’d have to think that if TNA did 100 Ultimate X matches, someone is bound to die or at least become paralyzed in one of them. It seemed for a moment that Christopher Daniels might be that person.

    And so, while I really enjoyed the action here, it’s hard to endorse such a dangerous match. I think the answer, as I mentioned before, is for TNA to keep the frequency of this kind of match to an absolute minimum. And when they do use it make it count. Put it in a main event slot, or just below.

    I won’t spend too much time on the rest of the mid-card. The Beautiful People are a good act, but were better with Angelina Love. The Legends Title three way was forgettable. Kevin Nash looked as old as ever in the ring, but deserves credit for being willing to work and put over young guys – which seems to be a rare thing among TNA veterans these days.

    The three-way Knockouts title match was fine, and I thought the finishing sequence involving the chair was well executed. Lashley vs. Joe was weird. And it was too short. As talented as Lahley is, he’s in danger of suffering the same kind of fan backlash that plagued him in WWE – especially if he refuses to do a job out of concern for hurting his reputation in mixed martial arts.  Samoa Joe looks awful. I certainly don’t subscribe to the philosophy that all wrestlers need to look like bodybuilders. But they should look like athletes, and Joe does not. He needs to lose some serious weight, hit a gym, and get a tan.

    The four-tag team full metal mayhem match was fine for what it was. TNA needs to get rid of the silly IWGP tag team titles that mean nothing to TNA fans.  And I certainly hope the rumors are true and that’s the last we see of Booker T and Scott Steiner.

    If you’re going to do Mick Foley vs. Abyss, then it has to be a garbage match. And so, that’s what we got, and I have to admit to having been largely entertained by it – even if I have no use for either competitor, or this outdated style of wrestling.  But I thought it told a decent story, and that Abyss came out of the match a little stronger than he went into it, which is all we could ask for.

    I quite liked Kurt Angle vs. Matt Morgan, and was happy to see Morgan have the kind of “breakthrough” performance that a lot of people have been hoping to see from him. He held up his end of a dramatic and intense big match, and at the end of it, came off more like a star than in the two years that TNA has been promoting him as one. He still has a long way to go in his promos and some of his mannerisms (That pointing at his imaginary watch thing is so lame), but for the first time, we started to see hints of the kind of star power that TNA has hoped to get out of him for a long time now.

    As for Kurt, once again he gave the performance of the night – all the while making wrestling fans feeling guilty for cheering him on despite the mounds of evidence that he has no business competing anymore. From a physical standpoint, Angle looks as bad as I’ve ever seen him. He’s pale, skinny, and his mobility seems quite limited. And still, he is the best wrestler in TNA. It’s quite the problem.

    In the main event spot, A.J. Styles vs. Sting was just OK – and no better than that. The match seemed to be squeezed for time, and never kicked into “third gear” with a dramatic final sequence. The end just seemed to come out of nowhere, and even looked a bit botched because Styles did not have the space to properly execute his springboard 450 splash.

    The intrigue over whether this was Sting’s final match was not intriguing at all. I give credit to Sting for avoiding the same mistake that Ric Flair, Foley and so many others have made – vowing that they will never wrestle again only to come out of retirement within a few months. Sting has refused to commit to never wrestling again, and that’s fine. If he wants to take some time off now, but leave the door open for a special return match some day, he should be able to do that. But if that’s the case, it was just absurd for TNA to try to sell this pay per view on the notion that it “very well may be” Sting’s final match. Well, every match of every wrestler’s career “very well may be” his last. The hype was just stupid and unnecessary.

    Ah – “stupid and unnecessary.” Now that sounds more like a TNA pay per view review.

    But all jokes aside, this was very much a step in the right direction for TNA. A few good matches. Young wrestlers being put over strong against aging ones. Some thrilling spots, a little bit of gore, Kurt Angle defying doctors, and TNA’s best homegrown performer leaving the building with the world title. That’s about all you can ask for out of TNA.

     

  • On Shane McMahon Leaving WWE

    I know it's been a while since you've heard from me -- my day job has kept me furiously busy and I figured you'd quickly get bored of me complaining of a total apathy towards wrestling these days -- but I woke up Friday to some incredible news.

    Shane McMahon's leaving WWE.

    It doesn't seem like a work, and honestly, I can't say it's altogether surprising. There's already speculation that he's resigned to work for his mother's ridiculous Senate campaign, but I think (and I base this completely on my own speculation and observation, no current inside information) he's just trying to spread his wings and see what he can accomplish outside his father's company.

    (Another sign it's probably not a work: The company released it on a Friday, which is traditionally the day companies release news they wish to keep as low-key as possible. Releasing something on a Friday ensures it enters the Saturday news cycle, which is the least-watched of the week.)

    It's been widely assumed since I worked there (and probably before) that Stephanie and Triple H would be the ones taking over the "Vince" reins one day. And while there was speculation that Shane would take over the business end from his mother (and still might), I always got the impression that as much as Shane loves the wrestling business, he always wanted to see what was out there.

    If that is the case, and if Shane's leaving WWE to make his own mark and test the waters, then he's absolutely doing the right thing. I remember chatting with Shane the day I gave my notice with the company to thank him for all the opportunity he'd given me during my years there. He was incredibly encouraging and supportive -- very kind and gracious -- and really made me optimistic about what my future might hold. In fact, though I had some great experiences at WWE, leaving the company turned out to be one of the best decisions I've ever made.

    If there's some other reason for Shane's leaving -- storyline or otherwise -- then we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

    For now, I wish Shane all the luck in the world, and I'll say the same thing to him that I've said to everyone else I've known -- wrestlers and front office -- who's left the company: Congratulations. You just made the best decision of your life.

  • Shane's departure, Me vs. Bruno and Bound for Glory thoughts

    A few notes as we kick off the weekend.

    . I was as surprised as anyone to hear the news of Shane McMahon resigning from WWE. Once can only assume that this is likely temporary, and that whenever Shane gets out of his system whatever it is he needs to get out, he will find his way back into the family business. But maybe not. Shane has always struck me as the most sane and grounded of the McMahons – at least of the ones we usually see on TV: Vince, Stephanie and Shane. The line on him has always been that he is not as passionate about WWE as his sister or dad. And that’s probably a good thing. Vince has sacrificed more than most of us will ever know to run WWE the only way he knows how. Stephanie, being a chip off the old block, has gone as far as to marry one of WWE’s top stars and start a family with him. Meanwhile, Shane has quietly raised a family of his own, made a big impact in WWE’s multi-media side, and had his fun occasionally appearing on television (and destroying WWE’s top heel. But that’s a rant for a different day.)

    My guess is that Shane-O-Mac will return to the fold before too long, but if he doesn’t, good for him. Vince and Stephanie may never get this, but WWE does not have to completely consume the life of everyone named McMahon. Shane really does deserve to be wished well on his future endeavors.

    . I called the legendary Bruno Sammartino on the phone earlier this week, initially to get some comments from him on the passing of Lou Albano. But when I mentioned to him my recent blog post in which I proposed that WWE should induct him into the Hall of Fame against his will, our discussion turned into a nearly two-hour debate on the issue of his potential induction. I say "debate" rather than interview, because I spent most of my energy trying to convince him to make nice with Vince McMahon, if only for one night. We had a really fun back and forth – and I think we made a little bit of progress on the issue. I hope to transcribe our conversation soon. But, if in the meantime Sammartino shows up on WWE television, I’d like to think I deserve full credit for having brokered a truce.

    . It’s rare that I sit down to watch an entire TNA pay per view, but I plan to catch this Sunday’s "Bound for Glory," which TNA likes to trumpet as its version of WrestleMania. For the fourth year in a row, Sting challenges for the world title in the main event.

    Putting aside all of TNA’s propaganda, this really could be a landmark pay per view for TNA – as it will be the first since Vince Russo has settled into the role of having full creative control of the company. For the past ten years, Russo has come up with various excuses for his countless failures as a booker, first in WCW and then in TNA. He’s out of excuses now. For better or for worse (and I’d certainly argue the latter), TNA President Dixie Carter has handed over the reins to Russo and his outdated, "Crash TV" philosophy of booking. TNA’s weekly Impact television show has not been noticeably better, perhaps aside from the match between Kurt Angle and A.J. Styles last night. I’ve got zero confidence that Russo is the panacea to all of TNA’s problems, but I’m all for Dixie finally giving Russo all the rope he needs to hang himself. And maybe that will finally happen Sunday night.

    As for the card itself – there’s not much there that makes the show feel any more special than any other TNA pay per view. The top matches - Styles vs. Sting, Angle vs. Matt Morgan and Samoa Joe vs. Bobby Lashley – all have the potential to be quite good, but it will require Russo minimizing his involvement in their booking, and instead relying on the athletes to do what they do best.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Vote

Who is your favorite wrestler from the '80s?

  • Jake "The Snake" Roberts
  • Captain Lou Albano
  • Brutus "The Barber" Beefcake
  • Junk Yard Dog
  • Andre the Giant
  • "Macho Man" Randy Savage
  • Hulk Hogan
  • Brett "Hitman" Hart
  • Ultimate Warrior
  • Ravishing Rick Rude
  • Hacksaw Jim Duggan
  • The British Bulldogs
  • Jimmy "Superfly" Snuka
  • Bob Backlund
  • George "The Animal" Steele
  • Rowdy Roddy Piper
  • Steve "Sting" Borden
  • Ric Flair, "The Nature Boy"
  • Jesse "The Body" Ventura
  • King Kong Bundy
  • Ted DiBiase, "The Million Dollar Man"
  • The Iron Sheik