Joye Brown has been a columnist for Newsday since 2006. She joined the newspaper in 1983 and has Show More
The Long Island Rail Road did a poor job communicating with riders Wednesday.
Yes, the railroad generated tweets and emails and messages and updates galore about late-running trains, and about a temporary suspension or service into Penn Station.
But honestly, commuters -- including those who, wisely, signed up to receive the LIRR's notices -- frequently get word about late trains. And, as for temporary interruptions of service, well, those, from time to time, are part of the commuting experience, too.
Which is why when such missives come, LIRR commuters generally will do what LIRR commuters do -- grit it out.
But the commuting experience was far from ordinary on Hump Day after a 4:45 a.m. power outage that affected the railroad's signal system outside the East River tunnels in Queens cascaded into hours of disruption for morning-rush riders.
Over time, late trains became stalled or slow-moving ones, while the wait for would-be riders on platforms and in Penn Station on a hot September morning transformed into an ordeal.
Effective communication -- earlier and throughout the day -- would have given riders information they needed to make their own plans, whether that meant working from home or seeking alternate means of transportation to their intended destinations.
"It's as if there was a disconnect between riders sitting on the trains and the people sitting in the railroad's front office," Mark Epstein, chairman of the Long Island Rail Road Commuter Council, said Friday.
And that disconnect, frustrated riders told Newsday, appeared to extend even to the LIRR's own workforce -- as conductors on some trains told passengers that they had no news to share because they didn't know what was going on either.
This, in hindsight, ended up being a test for the railroad's new leadership. And one, even the railroad would end up acknowledging Friday afternoon, that it failed.
Yes, last week's problem was fraying infrastructure; and, yes, that most certainly must be addressed. But when significant disruptions occur, the railroad should be able to handle the job of getting things back on line -- and giving riders information enough to decide their next move.
In 2012, after service went down domino-like after a lightning strike generated a power surge that disabled a portion of the signal system west of Jamaica station -- which was then followed by an employee error that made things worse rather than better during evening rush -- the Office of the MTA Inspector General did an investigation.
It found a number of faults -- and the railroad's lack of effective communication was one of them. "Despite the development of a communication strategy that aims to provide detailed and informative content, the substance of on-board messages still does not adequately and consistently explain travel conditions and offer useful information that allows customers to evaluate alternate travel options," the report noted.
The LIRR's "Pledge to Customers" -- which now covers MTA subway, bus and train riders too -- includes this promise: "If we must temporarily suspend service or close facilities . . . the MTA will provide timely notice . . . so that customers can plan their trips accordingly."
For too many riders, the LIRR failed on that promise last week.
On Friday afternoon, the railroad posted "An Explanation and an Apology for the Events of September 2, 2015," which states, in part:
"We regret that because we could not estimate when the signal power problem would be resolved or trains would again be moving, our communication efforts did not live up to either our customers' expectations or our own standards."
The statement goes on to state that the LIRR will scrutinize how it handles rider communications as part of its review of last week's service disruption.
Next time will tell.