Top court upholds conviction of son who tried to sully father's academic rivals

+ -

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Spin Cycle

News, views and commentary on Long Island, state and national politics.

New York’s highest court largely upheld the conviction of a man who concocted a sprawling scheme to attack the integrity and reputation of Dead Sea Scrolls academics and scholars who were critical of his father’s research.

The state Court of Appeals, in a 6-1 decision, affirmed the conviction of Raphael Golb on 10 counts of forgery and nine counts of criminal impersonation, all misdemeanors. It dismissed 10 various counts, including charges for identity theft, criminal impersonation and aggravated harassment.

Golb, a Manhattan resident, was accused of creating roughly 80 pseudonyms, impersonating real academics, publishing anonymous blogs and entrapping one scholar in an email exchange -- all for the purpose of discrediting anyone critical of Norman Golb, his father, a Dead Sea Scrolls scholar at the University of Chicago. The younger Golb even had impersonated a New York University professor -- who was a scholarly rival of the elder Golb -- and sent emails to NYU students and deans saying he had plagiarized his father’s work, according to the court.

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Court documents indicate Golb “waged” his battle over the Internet from 2006 to 2009 when he was arrested in his Greenwich Village apartment. A jury had convicted him on 30 counts; Golb faced six months in jail.

Judge Sheila Abdus-Salaam, writing for the majority, said there was “sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding” that Golb’s impersonations of academics “were more than a prank intended to cause temporary embarrassment or discomfiture, and that he acted with intent to do real harm.”

Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman dissented, saying Golb’s transgressions should have been addressed in a civil lawsuit and didn’t meet the threshold for being treated as a crime. He said his colleagues’ interpretation of criminal impersonation laws “criminalizes a vast amount of speech that the First Amendment protects.” He added the decision would “give prosecutors power they should not have to determine what speech should and should not be penalized.”

 Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, who prosecuted the case, declined comment. Golb's attorney couldn't be reached immediately to comment.

The best of Newsday every day in your inbox. Get the Newsday Now newsletter!

Comments

Newsday.com now uses Facebook for our comment boards. Please read our guidelines and connect your Facebook account to comment.

You also may be interested in: