Letter: LIRR projects don't benefit many

A file photo of a train pulling into

A file photo of a train pulling into the Ronkonkoma LIRR station. (Sept. 30, 2011) Photo Credit: Ed Betz

advertisement | advertise on newsday

It's a shame to see the respected Rauch Foundation fund such a one-sided report . By advocating for Long Island Rail Road capital projects that are already well in the pipeline -- the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's East Side Access project and the double-track plan between Farmingdale and Ronkonkoma -- the foundation has failed its bold ideas mission.

Certainly there are plenty of economic trends relevant to the LIRR, from a long economic slump to the explosive growth of New York City bike paths -- but no place near Penn Station to store the bikes. An analysis of the best place to build a sorely needed north-south rail connection, for instance, would have been original.

advertisement | advertise on newsday

By focusing on projects such as a second midtown LIRR terminal, at Grand Central, when we don't even have downtown access, the study simply promotes allocating billions for a very small minority of MTA customers. When trains travel to either Penn or Grand Central stations, I believe that the result will be longer wait times departing the city for nearly all -- even if there is a shorter commute into the city for some.

Steven Hirsch, Great Neck

Sign up for The Point and go inside New York politics.


Newsday.com now uses Facebook for our comment boards. Please read our guidelines and connect your Facebook account to comment.

You also may be interested in: