Deputy Nassau County attorney Daniel Grippo states that he didn’t believe the county had the right to hold up the contract with VIP Splash Waterways Recovery Group Inc., just because it’s under investigation [“Nassau OKs $400G,” News, June 7].

He states, “The alternative is litigation, and you’d be arguing that the commencement of an investigation justified nonpayment.”

advertisement | advertise on newsday

No, you would argue that the extra work done was outside the current contract and not authorized.

The county consistently allows work to proceed without contract approval, and then uses the excuse that the work was already done as justification to approve payment. That is not how it should work.

Susan Zecca, Levittown

Editor’s note: The writer is retired and worked as a fiscal officer in the Nassau County Comptroller’s office.