Letter: Nude sunbathing isn't 'repulsive'

At a beach on Fire Island with nude,

At a beach on Fire Island with nude, unidentified sun bathers. (April 16, 2002) Photo Credit: Daniel Goodrich

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Having read "Nude sunbathing is better restricted" [Letters, March 11], I feel compelled to disagree. I have been frequenting the clothing-optional section of Lighthouse Beach for more than 20 years, and I've failed to notice that "nude sunbathing has become perverse and lewd, and consequently repulsive."

Perhaps because I was busy sunning myself, reading my book or newspaper and socializing with friends, I didn't notice. The letter writer was most likely gawking and getting a vicarious thrill.

Was the writer really forced to walk the "tick-infested back way"? I doubt it. If she had, she would have found a lovely, winding, boardwalk over the dunes from the east end of Robert Moses State Park to Kismet and beyond. I've walked and biked it without encountering a tick.

David Tennenbaum, Islandia

Sign up for the Opinion newsletter and get the latest analysis delivered to your inbox.

Comments

Newsday.com now uses Facebook for our comment boards. Please read our guidelines and connect your Facebook account to comment.

You also may be interested in: