Letter: Pre-storm premium for damaged homes

An aerial shot of Fire Island and a An aerial shot of Fire Island and a look at the destruction caused by superstorm Sandy. (Oct. 31, 2012) Photo Credit: Doug Kuntz

advertisement | advertise on newsday

So much devastation and heartache resulted from superstorm Sandy. Needless to say, dollars are needed to restore infrastructure and our communities. Having said that, I am conflicted about the decision to pay homeowners 100 percent of the pre-storm value for their damaged properties to keep them from rebuilding ["State's home buyouts come to Staten Island," News, Feb. 25].

If flood and homeowners insurance were available, and people made a decision not to purchase coverage, then why should taxpayer dollars be used to make them whole?

advertisement | advertise on newsday

At best, they should be paid a post-Sandy value, plus the proposed 5 percent bonus to remain in the area. At what point are individuals responsible for our own choices?

Robert Biancardi, Valley Stream

Sign up for the Opinion newsletter and get the latest analysis delivered to your inbox.

You also may be interested in: