Letter: School spending portrayed unfairly

If the changes that won unanimous Board of If the changes that won unanimous Board of Regents approval Monday, Oct. 20, 2014, win final approval from the Regents in January as scheduled, they would first take effect with teenagers who entered ninth grade in 2011 and are due to graduate in June 2015. Photo Credit: Daniel Brennan

advertisement | advertise on newsday

I wish the article "LI Schools: Spending Up" [News, May 1] had been a more realistic portrayal of the economic and political reality that Long Island school districts face.

Your chart displaying Bay Shore's proposed 2013-14 tax-levy increase as 6.4 percent was disingenuous to say the least. You embedded the actual rate increase voters will decide on, 5.9 percent, in the 13th paragraph of the story.

Moreover, you could have provided a more balanced picture of Bay Shore's situation, one in which teachers and administrators voted overwhelmingly to take a wage freeze to help the district save programs and teaching positions.

I trust that Newsday readers will read through paragraph 13. I also anticipate that readers will understand that the economic problems faced by Long Island school districts are caused by an unfair distribution of state aid and an undemocratic tax cap that violates the principle of one person-one vote.

Justin Martinich, Long Beach

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Editor's note: The writer is a social studies teacher at Bay Shore High School.

You also may be interested in: