Letters: School speed cameras debate

Traffic moves past the sign for the red-light

Traffic moves past the sign for the red-light camera on Old Country Road in Westbury on Aug. 18, 2011. Photo Credit: Newsday/Thomas A. Ferrara

advertisement | advertise on newsday

So let's get this correct: The speed cameras proposed for school zones are for the benefit of creating revenue for the various participants -- counties, villages -- and not for the safety of the children or the crossing guards ["Traffic cameras stalled," News, April 2]?

It's great to hear that our elected officials have placed the value of the dollar over the well-being of our youngest constituents. I'm all for the placement of speed cameras in schools zones -- but not as speed traps.

Richard Meyer, Lindenhurst

I'm happy that our state has the fortitude to stop this never-ending reliance on penalty-based revenue. Both Nassau and Suffolk counties want speed cameras to raise revenue.

Now that it looks as though this may not happen, will we get more red-light cameras? And when more revenue is needed, more cameras?

Can we figure out our budget problems without resorting to penalties, fines, racinos, fees and the like? Please find a way!

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Robert Montelione, Massapequa Park


Newsday.com now uses Facebook for our comment boards. Please read our guidelines and connect your Facebook account to comment.

You also may be interested in: