Valuing life in all its forms

Travel deals

Last weekend at my favorite ice cream shop, I met an

adorable 4-year-old boy named Sully. He had bright blue, inquisitive eyes, a

happy smile and, judging from his telltale facial features, Down syndrome.


CARTOONS: Matt Davies | Jimmy Margulies | National roundup

MORE: Newsday columnists | More opinion

CONNECT: Subscribe to our e-mail list | Twitter | Facebook


Only weeks before I had read a staggering statistic: 92 percent of unborn

children diagnosed with Down syndrome are now aborted. I don't normally get

overly exercised about the issue of abortion, but this number struck me as I

looked at Sully. With only 8 percent of prospective Down parents choosing to

have their child, Sully may grow up with no peers to interact with in his life.

Somehow, we are saying the lives of children with Down mean less than those of

so-called normal children.

Admittedly, the economic costs of raising children with Down can be

onerous. The emotional strain can cause rifts between parents. There can be

serious medical complications. As a matter of fact, in a survey conducted by

Brian Skotko at Harvard Medical School, 3,000 mothers receiving the news that

their child would have Down syndrome reported that physicians expressed

negative views about them continuing their pregnancies.

Something profound and disturbing lies at the heart of this dilemma. If

parents and even doctors so devalue the life of a child with Down, what

prospects do they have in their lives and in the judgment of society at large?

Of course, the 92 percent abortion rate pertains only to those women having

prenatal testing for disabilities. The prevalence of children born with Down

syndrome has not actually seen a dramatic decrease in the United States (it is

approximately 1 in 733), which means that many pregnant women are not getting

these tests. But prenatal testing has become safer and more common among

younger women, and now more than 70 percent are undergoing screening. So the

question is what will these women, parents and doctors do, as information about

unborn children's disabilities becomes more readily available? At the current

rate, we will eventually exterminate children with Down from society.

And the world will miss out on the opportunity to experience these

wonderful and giving members of our communities. Yes, often many parents of

children with Down syndrome experience grief and shock when given the

diagnosis, but upon follow-up, parents expound on the joys and happiness their

child has brought to the family, and the optimism they feel for their child's

future. Children with Down syndrome play with peers, participate in sports

programs, graduate from high school, and can live independent lives in the

community with proper supports.

Today, there are waiting lists of parents wanting to adopt children with

Down syndrome in the United States and internationally. The National Down

Syndrome Society has been working closely with health-care professionals to

make all aspects of having a child with Down syndrome - including the positive

ones - known to parents when they are presented with the diagnosis.

Down syndrome is not the only condition that is targeted in the womb.

Recently a French Genetics Lab identified a region on chromosome 16 that is

apparently linked to autism. This study immediately raised questions about the

availability of prenatal testing for autism. If the Down syndrome figures are

any indication, this could represent the next wave in disability-related

abortion.

Such abortions raise painful questions normally relegated to the religious

or philosophical spheres. Do we want only "perfect" children? Does society

value "normal" people more than those with disabilities? Is the unalienable

equality inherent in all humans a fraud?

Ironically, the world seems to have legislated away discrimination against

people with disabilities, from the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act to

the recent UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We seem to

have come a long way, but maybe it's not so far at all. The Eugenics movement

in the early 1900s was a precursor to Nazi Germany's genocide of persons with

disabilities. Ninety-two percent is a virtual extermination, sanctioned by

doctors and parents. It's a number that reflects the broader society's attitude

toward persons with disabilities.

We have resolved in the courts, for the time being, the issue of abortion.

It remains a woman's choice. But that choice is demeaned if communities devalue

the life of its disabled. The vast majority of these children are handicapped

in the womb, condemned by their disability to disposable status despite the

fact that children like Sully can live long, happy lives that enrich everyone

they touch. Awareness of the equality of all children - including children with

disabilities - is the first step to legitimizing a woman's right to true

choice and to the broader acceptance in society for the rights of persons with

disabilities.

advertisement | advertise on newsday

Newsday Opinion on social media

advertisement | advertise on newsday