Analysis, discussion and opinions by members of Newsday's editorial board.
BloggersAlvin Bessent Rita Ciolli Michael Dobie Joseph Dolman Lane Filler Sam Guzik Anne Michaud Larry Striegel
Misinformation: Bill Clinton first suggested armed guards in schools
MISINFORMATION: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT
A recent letter to the editor criticized President Barack Obama for his "skepticism" about the National Rifle Association's "proposal to put armed guards in schools," following the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
The writer claimed there is a precedent -- hailing from Obama's very own Democratic Party. President Bill Clinton in 1998 announced a $60 million initiative to put police officers in schools. Run by the Department of Justice's Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), the program was intended to "protect school children," according to the letter writer.
AUDIO: Listen to the 911 calls
MORE: Complete coverage
This writer has a point, but he's only half right. There was indeed a COPS in Schools program initiated in 1998 by former President Clinton. But, according to stories from the time, the intent was far different from having an armed guard for children's protection.
"Having officers in schools is not just about safety," said COPS Office Director Joseph E. Brann in a press release from October 15, 1998. "Law enforcement officers can serve as mentors to students, build respect for the police profession, and teach students everything from substance abuse prevention to the principles of law enforcement."
The initiative was part of Clinton's plan to add 100,000 officers across the country.
Waterville, Maine, apparently served as a model. In March 10, 1995, the Bangor Daily News carried a story about the city council approving a full-time police officer for the school beat. "The officer's priorities will be speaking with the kids, talking about peer pressure, drugs and alcohol," the paper quoted Waterville's deputy police chief, John Massey.
At the time, Clinton noted, "schools are still among the safest places for America's young people." It's sad to read that now, in light of the Newtown, Conn., events and other school shootings.
Ever submitted a letter to the editor and wondered why it wasn’t published? Sometimes – not always – it’s because Newsday’s research revealed that the information in the letter wasn’t quite accurate. So, the letter disappears into a void, which may leave writers wondering what happened. That's why we're introducing this regular feature, “Misinformation,” on our blog -- to try to set the record straight about a wrong fact or impression.
Does Sandy Hook change the gun control debate?
Yes, we need and we'll get tougher gun control laws Yes, even though we don't need it we'll get tougher gun control laws No, even though we need it we won't get tougher gun control laws No, we don't need and won't get tougher gun control laws