There's been a lot of discussion in the Internet wrestling community over the last 24 hours about WWE's last minute major angle headed into the Survivor Series. In case you missed it, WWE.com reported that Jeff Hardy was found unconscious in the stairwell of his hotel early yesterday morning and was rushed to a hospital and was questionable for his triple threat WWE title match later in the evening.
Apparently some mainstream news media picked up the story, and WWE sold it to the hilt when Survivor Series went on the air.
Obviously, the criticism of the angle was its eerily similar tone to the many news stories we've unfortunately become accustomed to over the years about wrestler deaths. And, since it involved Jeff Hardy, there was even more reason for fans to fear the worst.
Now, I am the first to bash WWE for its tendency toward tasteless angles, including many that have exploited wrestlers' deaths and the very real emotion that those tragedies stir in fans. I still haven't gotten over Mr. McMahon's exploding limo.
But I have to come to WWE's defense in this one - albeit somewhat half-heartedly.
The reality is, the old "wrestler attacked in hotel room" angle is as old as time, and has been a reliable, if not terribly original, way to build anticipation for a match. Obviously, the few key differences between this angle is that it unfortunately comes during an era when wrestlers being found dead in their hotel rooms is not all that shocking, and also an era when the Internet is a viable tool for wrestling companies to forward angles.
Don't think for a second that if Jim Crockett 25 years had the ability to use the Internet to sell a storyline hours before a big show, he wouldn't have used it. With WWE taping its final TV show before Survivor Series five days earlier, it makes sense for WWE to take advantage of its web site, and condition fans to visit the site in the days leading up to show for any late breaking developments.
A lot of the criticism has dealt with how seriously WWE, its wrestlers and announcers sold the angle. Some people likened their mood to the somber emotions exhibited in the hours after the deaths of Owen Hart, Eddie Guerrero or Chris Benoit.
But isn't a wrestling promotion's job to make fans think its real? To criticize them for doing too good a job is to say they should have made the angle look more fake. And the fact is, for the pay off of the angle (Edge's surprise return and title win) to really work, it was important that fans didn't see it coming.
None of this is to say that fans don't have a right to dislike the angle, or even feel a bit resentful that they were put in a position to worry about a wrestler's health. But their criticisms should really be directed at the wrestling industry as a whole for creating a culture where it's not that uncommon these days to get news of a wrestler's death hours before a pay per view.
What's more, WWE writers certainly could have been a little more delicate in choosing their words, and not exploited Hardy's spotty history in the company. It should have been made clear to fans that Hardy was apparently "attacked" in his hotel room, and not just found unconscious. Jeff's brother Matt may have delivered the most questionable line of the night when he talked about expecting "the worst."
Also, if they weren't, everybody in WWE should have been smartened up to the angle ahead of time.
But from purely a wrestling angle perspective, the fact is bookers from 20 years would have killed to pull off an angle like WWE did last night. It created drama and anticipation leading up to an otherwise lackluster semi-main event, delivered a huge pay off in the form of Edge making his shocking return and capturing the WWE championship, and sets up loads of possible grudges - including a money feud between Hardy and Edge, who presumably was behind Jeff's attack.
I think we sometimes lose sight that a wrestling promotion's job is to make you think it's real. Apparently, WWE did too good a job last night for a lot of people's tastes.