Newsday's new all-encompassing baseball blog on the Yankees, Mets, MLB and more from around the sport.
BloggersErik Boland Marc Carig Cody Derespina Nick Klopsis Mark La Monica David Lennon Casey Musarra Anthony Rieber
Report: Mets, Marlins talked Jason Bay swap
Jason Bay is in the Mets lineup Thursday afternoon at AT&T Park, and has already knocked in two runs during the first inning.
But the slugger-turned-disappointment might have been suiting up for Miami tonight had some trade deadline talk went a little further.
Ken Rosenthal cites major league sources as saying the Mets and Marlins discussed a trade that would have sent Bay to Miami and shipped reliever Heath Bell and catcher John Buck to New York.
Rosenthal notes that a deal was never close.
Bay was hitting .157 coming into Thursday with five home runs. After several All-Star seasons with the Pirates and Red Sox, the oft-injured Bay has struggled with the Mets. “Struggled” might be putting it too lightly: he's hitting .239 with 23 home runs during his three seasons in New York.
Buck signed with the Marlins before the 2010 season, coming off a standout campaign in Toronto. But his performance dropped off and he's hitting .169 with eight home runs this season. The Mets have been reported to be looking for a catcher, so a Buck acquisition could make some sense.
Bell, the former Met who became an All-Star closer in San Diego, has been sacked from the closer role in Miami due to poor results. He's 2-5 with a 5.57 ERA and 19 saves. Ugly numbers to be sure, but the Mets are currently welcoming back a closer with a 4.97 ERA and 18 saves in Frank Francisco.
The trade would have been a classic “change of scenery” move, and the contracts somewhat match up.
Bay has one year and $16 million remaining on his contract with a $17 million option for 2014 that vests based on plate appearances.
Buck has one year and $6 million left on his deal.
Bell has two years at $9 million per year left on his contract. There's also a $9 million team option for 2015 that becomes guaranteed based on performance.
That would mean the Mets absorb $24 million with a possible $9 million more, for a total of $33 million.
The Marlins, meanwhile, would absorb $16 million with the possibility for $17 million more, a total of $33 million.