First of all, accountability time: I made a bad read off the Braves' acquisition of Javier Vazquez a couple of days ago. I incorrectly assumed that trade would take Atlanta already out of the A.J. Burnett bidding. Shoot, given the Braves' thriftiness of recent years, I never considered Atlanta a serious candidate for Burnett in the first place.
But it appears now that the Braves are the favorites to sign Burnett. Their executives were expressing confidence to their friends throughout the industry, as I wrote today, and it appears that Burnett's agent Darek Braunecker wasn't bluffing a couple of weeks ago when he told me Burnett would have a five-year deal to sign. Who would've thunk the Braves would go where the Yankees and Blue Jays wouldn't? Props to Mark Feinsand for having this yesterday.
Remember when the Braves were the industry's best team, by far? When signings like Terry Pendleton, above, paid off brilliantly, and when they developed players like Tom Glavine, Chipper and Andruw Jones and David Justice?
That era seems so distant now, doesn't it? After being owned by one of the most memorable human beings of our time, love Ted Turner or hate him, the Braves are now very much a corporate entity, and they've gone from 14 straight division titles (from 1991 through 2005) to a 235-251 team the last three seasons.
If they go ahead and sign Burnett _ and that seems like a safe bet _ the Braves will be trying something they haven't in a while: A high-risk, high-reward move. It could easily backfire, given Burnett's history of visits to the disabled list.
But if Burnett is right, he teams with Vazquez and Jair Jurrjens to give the Braves a decent front end of the starting rotation, with Jorge Campillo also displaying promise. The Braves ranked 12th in the National League with a 4.46 ERA last year. They ranked a more respectable sixth with 753 runs scored. So if they have indeed improved their pitching, the Braves could be an interesting team again, much to the Mets' chagrin.
whynot, your take is requested on this one.
Transaction Analysis: The Giants signed Bob Howry to a one-year deal for $2.75 million. Gotta give the Giants credit for being aggressive, as they've added Howry and Jeremy Affeldt to what was a bad bullpen. Howry put up what looks like a very bad 2008 season, but our own James K. points out that Howry had an unlucky .354 BABIP, considering his line-drive percentage of 17.9. He also had a strikeout: walk ratio of 59:13 in 70.2 innings.
Why didn't the Mets go after him? It's apparent the Mets are saving their bullpen resources for two pitchers and only two pitchers _ a closer from either Brian Fuentes or Francisco Rodriguez, and a setup man with closer's experience like Huston Street _ and otherwise will go bargain hunting. That equation will change if the Mets acquire J.J. Putz, but as Joel Sherman points out today, the competition for Putz, whom Seattle is now reportedly making available, will be fierece.
The Giants' impending acquisition of Edgar Renteria makes sense if it's a one-year deal; Renteria put up a decent second half for the Tigers last year, and he's clearly more comfortable in the National League. Otherwise, not so much.
The Cardinals are going to acquire Khalil Greene from San Diego. Another case of buying low. More often than not, Tony La Russa gets the most out of his players, even if they don't like him. So this figures to work out all right, as the Padres continue to tear down their franchise.
Speaking of which, with the Braves both taking away one of the Yankees' options in Burnett and eliminating themselves as a landing spot for Jake Peavy, could this mean...? Have baileywalk's prayers paid off? Not with the Cubs still trying to get something done on Peavy.
We talked yesterday how CC Sabathia doesn't necessarily hate New York; he just prefers the West Coast. Peavy, though? "Hate" is the precise word a friend of Peavy's used to describe the right-hander's feelings toward The Big Apple.
Thanks to this site for the photo.