WASHINGTON -- As the world gets warmer, people are more likely to get hot under the collar, scientists say. A massive new study finds that aggressive acts such as committing violent crimes and waging war become more likely with each added degree.
Researchers analyzed 60 studies on historic empire collapses, recent wars, violent crime rates in the United States, lab simulations that tested police decisions on when to shoot and even cases of pitchers throwing deliberately at batters in baseball. They found a common thread over centuries: Extreme weather -- very hot or dry -- means more violence.
The authors say the results show strong evidence that climate can promote conflict.
"When the weather gets bad we tend to be more willing to hurt other people," said economist Solomon Hsiang of the University of California, Berkeley. He is the lead author of the study, published online yesterday by the journal Science.
Experts in the causes of war gave it a mixed reception.
The team of economists came up with a formula to predict how much the risk of different types of violence should increase with extreme weather.
In war-torn parts of equatorial Africa, it says, every added degree Fahrenheit or so increases the chance of conflict between groups -- rebellion, war, civil unrest -- by 11 percent to 14 percent. For the United States, the formula says that for every increase of 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit, the likelihood of violent crime goes up 2 percent to 4 percent.
Temperatures in much of North America and Eurasia are likely to go up by that 5.4 degrees by about 2065 because of increases in carbon dioxide pollution, according to a separate paper published Thursday in Science.
That paper sees global averages increasing by about 3.6 degrees in the next half-century, implying 40 percent to 50 percent more chance for African wars than would be without global warming, said Edward Miguel, a study co-author.
When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change updates its global warming report next year, it will address the issue of impacts on war for the first time, said Carnegie Institution scientist Chris Field, who heads that worldwide study group. The new study is likely to play a big role, he said.
Hsiang said that whenever the analyzed studies looked at temperature and conflict, the link was clear, no matter where or when. His analysis examines about a dozen studies on collapses of empires or dynasties, about 15 studies on crime and aggression and more than 30 studies on wars, civil strife or intergroup conflicts.
Hsiang pointed to the collapse of the Mayan civilization that coincided with periods of historic drought about 1,200 years ago.