TODAY'S PAPER
Overcast 55° Good Afternoon
Overcast 55° Good Afternoon
EntertainmentBooks

Excerpt from ‘From Holmes to Sherlock’ by Mattias Boström

"From Holmes to Sherlock" by Mattias Boström Photo Credit: Mysterious Press

It all started on a train.

That’s where the idea came to Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss. They were going to modernize one of the world’s most renowned literary characters — remove the filter of a misty London, full of hansom cabs — and bring Sherlock Holmes up to date, placing him squarely in our high-tech, contemporary world. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s creation would go from Victorian gentleman detective to modern, eccentric genius — from Holmes to Sherlock.

This, of course, was sacrilege. Such a television show was bound to be controversial among the fans, as Moffat and Gatiss were aware. Nevertheless, the more they discussed it, the stronger the idea seemed to grow. They wanted to do away with the classic symbols — the deerstalker, the pipe, the magnifying glass — all the nostalgia that was getting in the way, all those things that made Holmes seem more like a well-defined silhouette than a complex human being. The changes would, however, need to be made with great love for the original stories. The pair wanted to bring viewers really close to the original friendship between Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, closer than anyone had brought them since the figures were born in the author’s imagination well over a century before.

This was just a few years after the turn of the millennium, and for the time being their plan was no more than a tiny seed — just a topic of conversation during Gatiss and Moffat’s commute from London to their script-writing jobs at BBC Wales in Cardiff.

But there were lots of train journeys. And the idea kept on growing.

A short time later, on January 7, 2006, Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat found themselves at the Sherlock Holmes Society of London’s annual dinner. Gatiss had been invited to speak, and Moffat was there as his guest. Gatiss had also attended the previous year. He had been invited by a friend, Stephen Fry, a member of the society already in his early teens, who had been guest of honor and after-dinner speaker on that occasion. Gatiss had asked the society’s chairman for an invitation for the 2006 dinner.

So there he was, in his tuxedo and black bow tie, about to make a speech in front of the assembled members — Holmesians, as they called themselves, or Sherlockians, for those who preferred the more widespread American term.

They were seated in a dining room in the House of Commons, a magnificent and thoroughly fitting venue for a Victorian flight of fancy, with its carved oak panels and beautiful evening views across the Thames to the lights of Lambeth on the opposite bank. Slightly to the left was the London Eye, the symbol of modern London and thus of an updated version of Sherlock Holmes, too.

It was an anxious moment. That evening Gatiss and Moffat would float their idea before a broad audience for the first time — and these particular guinea pigs were among the most critical, circumspect subjects you could imagine.

Mark Gatiss was coming to the end of his speech. He had told the members of his long-standing interest in Holmes and had arrived at the train conversation with Moffat.

“We began to discuss the question: could Holmes be brought alive for a whole new generation?” Gatiss said. He described the scenario: “A young army doctor, wounded in Afghanistan, finds himself alone and friendless in London.” That detail about Afghanistan had been crucial for Gatiss and Moffat. The tale of Sherlock Holmes could in fact be introduced in the same way, regardless of whether it was set around 1880 or in the present. Those regions that were ravaged by war in the late nineteenth century remain conflict zones to this day.

“Short of cash,” Gatiss went on, “he bumps into an old medical acquaintance, who tells him he knows of someone looking for a flatmate. This bloke’s all right but a little odd. And so Dr. John Watson — wounded in the taking of Kabul from the Taliban — meets Sherlock Holmes, a geeky, nervous young man rather too fond of drugs, who’s amassed a lot of out-of-the-way knowledge on his laptop.” Gatiss looked out over the assembled Sherlock Holmes enthusiasts. “It’s only a thought. A beginning.”

The Sherlockians were a hardened bunch. Many attempts at recasting Sherlock Holmes had been made through the years. Some had succeeded, others had not. Would Gatiss and Moffat’s idea of bringing Holmes into the present find fertile ground?

“But to prove Holmes immortal,” Gatiss continued, “it’s essential he’s not preserved in Victorian aspic — but allowed to live again!”

The general opinion among those present seemed to be that this was, well, controversial. It was also, nonetheless, intelligent, funny, and stimulating — much like Gatiss himself.

The mood in the dining room was cheerful. Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat no longer had to hold their breath. Stage one was complete.

Every era had its own Sherlock Holmes. For over a century the famous detective had been reimagined to fit contemporary trends and ideals. Perhaps Gatiss and Moffat, with their new approach, would be the ones to ensure that yet another generation discovered Sherlock Holmes.

“Ladies and gentlemen,” Gatiss concluded, “I give you Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes, and Dr. Watson. Forever.”

From “Holmes to Sherlock: The Story of the Men and Women Who Created an Icon,” by Mattias Boström. Copyright © 2013, 2017 by Mattias Boström. English translation copyright © 2017 by Michael Gallagher. Reprinted with the permission of the publisher, The Mysterious Press, an imprint of Grove Atlantic, Inc. All rights reserved.

More Entertainment