How much is that doggie in the window? If you opt into a pet leasing agreement, that pup could cost nearly twice as much as what you’d pay upfront, animal rights advocates say.
Activists call the practice predatory lending. In many cases, customers aren’t even aware they’re leasing the animal, thinking instead they’re entering a loan agreement.
A bill, which is headed to the governor’s desk, would ban pet lending in New York State. Pet leasing was banned in Suffolk County in 2016.
Danielle Cittadino, 44, of Baldwin, said she unknowingly leased a golden retriever from Shake A Paw in Lynbrook in 2016. Cittadino thought she had agreed to finance the dog and for the past 23 months has made payments of about $145, she said.
But on July 30, she received an email from Monterey Financial Services, which processes payments for Wags Lending, informing her that she could either purchase the dog or return it.
“Never would I have thought it was a lease,” Cittadino said. “If I would have known, I would have just thrown up my hands and said no.”
Chris Hughes, president and chief executive of Monterey Financial Services, said the terms of the lease were clear in documents signed by Cittadino. He also said complaints like Cittadino’s were “extremely rare.”
A customer service representative for Wags declined to comment. On its website, Wags describes its pet leasing plan as an “alternative financing tool” for customers who otherwise couldn’t afford to take home a pet.
To buy her dog, Cittadino said her family would have to make a balloon payment of about $340 or the pooch, which the family named Max, could be repossessed. In Cittadino’s case, the Lynbrook pet store said in a statement it would cover the cost of Cittadino’s last payment “as an act of good will,” and that the store no longer partners with Wags.
What is pet lending?
Cittadino’s experience is not unique, said Bill Ketzer, the ASPCA’s senior director of state legislation for the Northeast region.
Pet lending services cropped up a few years ago and are similar to car leasing agreements, Ketzer said. Customers are charged monthly payments, and if they don’t pay up, the animal can be repossessed and are sometimes sent to a local animal shelter.
At the end of the lease, consumers are typically offered a purchase option.
Many customers, like Cittadino, don’t even realize they’re leasing the animal, Ketzer said.
“These plans are deceptive. They’re marketed to underinformed customers, and charge outrageously high leasing fees,” Ketzer said. “It ends up costing many times the animal’s original price.”
Is it legal?
Suffolk Legis. Monica Martinez (D-Brentwood) said she pushed to end the practice after animal advocates brought it to her attention.
“Businesses should not be able to threaten or seize an animal after an owner is unable to pay their bill,” Martinez said in a statement. “Eliminating pet-leasing practices protects the safety and livelihood of animals as well as the well-being of the purchaser.”
The rest of the state seems poised to follow Suffolk’s lead.
A new bill, sponsored by Assemb. Matthew Titone (D-Staten Island) and State Sen. Carl Marcellino (R-Syosset), aims to eliminate pet leasing in New York State. The legislation passed unanimously in both houses in June, and a spokeswoman for Marcellino said she hopes the bill will land on Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s desk for approval in the coming weeks.
“These rent-to-own plans are bad for your wallet and even worse for your new pet,” Marcellino said in a statement. “Once signed by the governor, my bill will protect consumers and pets from having to face this nightmare scenario ever again.”
Last year California and Nevada passed bans on pet leasing. A similar bill was introduced in Rhode Island, and lawmakers in New Jersey are also considering one.