After a meeting with Vice President Joe Biden, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called on Speaker John Boehner to bring the measure to the floor for an up-or-down vote. Boehner's spokesman said that "the lack of spending cuts in the Senate bill was a universal concern" among GOP House members.
Among those meeting reporters midafternoon Tuesday with Pelosi was Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-Woodside) who said, "The time for discussion and talk is coming to an end. It's going to be time for us to vote soon or all will be for naught. ... It's what the American people expect and deserve."
The House convened around noon Tuesday, and the parties went into caucuses to discuss Senate's bipartisan budget bill. The Senate agreement approved in the wee hours Tuesday would undo the potential economic harm of $600 billion in tax increases and spending cuts that are scheduled to go into effect.
The Senate vote shifts the pressure to House Speaker John Boehner, who hasn't said if he'll accept the agreement or change it. He will face difficulty mustering Republican votes for any bill with higher taxes for 2013 than they were in 2012. He hasn't said whether he'll ask the GOP caucus, which convenes at 1 p.m., to approve it. The issue in the GOP dominated House will be how much influence the ideological fringes of the party can still exert.
The Senate bill, passed 89-8, would make permanent the tax cuts for most households that ended at midnight, continue expanded unemployment benefits and delay automatic spending cuts for two months. A 2 percent payroll tax cut would be allowed to expire.
"While neither Democrats nor Republicans got everything they wanted, this agreement is the right thing to do for our country and the House should pass it without delay," President Barack Obama said in a statement released by the White House Tuesday morning.
The agreement isn't the grand bargain on deficit reduction lawmakers hoped for when they created the conjoined tax-and- spending deadlines over the past three years. Instead, if the agreement becomes law, it would avert most of the immediate pain and postpone Congress' fiscal feud for just two months -- until a February fight over raising the $16.4 trillion debt limit.
"There are many, many reasons why people dislike portions of this bill, but there's close to unanimity that it's better than going over the cliff," said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).
If it's brief, the dive off the so-called fiscal cliff, a term Federal Revenue chairman Ben Bernanke used when he spoke to the House Financial Services Committee in February, would have relatively minimal effects. It would avoid the recession that a longer lapse would cause.
The agreement, reached in the waning hours of 2012, was brokered by Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Three Democrats voted against the measure: Michael Bennet of Colorado, Tom Harkin of Iowa and Tom Carper of Delaware. They were joined by five Republicans who voted no: Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Mike Lee of Utah, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Marco Rubio of Florida and Richard Shelby of Alabama.
Compared to continuing current policies, the agreement would increase taxes by $620 billion and cut spending by $15 billion, according to people familiar with the negotiations.
"It's not the big, bold, bipartisan deal that we need, that the markets need, that our country needs, but a smaller deal that still provides some confidence to 98 percent of American families and small businesses that their tax rates won't go up," Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) told Bloomberg Television. "So while it's not what I had hoped, it is at least some progress in dealing with the fiscal cliff."
Winning passage in the House will require a sales job by leaders who are trying to resist pressure from the ideological fringes of their parties. House Republicans oppose tax increases for any income level and many may resist a bipartisan Senate deal that lacks spending cuts. Some Senate Democrats opposed the bill because it didn't raise enough revenue.
Boehner has said the House also might change whatever the Senate passes, sending it back to the Senate for consideration.
"The House will honor its commitment to consider the Senate agreement if it is passed," Boehner and other Republican leaders said in a statement. "Decisions about whether the House will seek to accept or promptly amend the measure will not be made until House members -- and the American people -- have been able to review the legislation."
The deal passed by the Senate would raise tax rates on income of individuals above $400,000 and married couples above $450,000. That's double the individual threshold Obama campaigned on and 80 percent higher than his preferred level for married couples.
Still, Obama used the leverage from his re-election and the expiration of the tax cuts to force Republicans to break their no-tax-increase position. The top rate would go to 39.6 percent, up from 35 percent.
The top rates on capital gains and dividends would increase to 23.8 percent starting at the same income thresholds, including a 3.8 percent tax that starts Tuesday on top earners. Limits on personal exemptions and itemized deductions for top earners that had been phased out will return, for individuals starting at $250,000 and married couples starting at $300,000.
Estates would receive a more-than $5 million exemption and 40 percent top rate, splitting the difference on rates between Republicans and Democrats. The exemption would be indexed for inflation. The alternative minimum tax would be permanently fixed to prevent it from expanding to more households.
For ultra-high-net-worth families, the estate tax rate -- rather than the exemption -- is most important, said Jere Doyle, senior wealth strategist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp. whose clients usually have at least $10 million in net worth.
"What the marginal dollars are taxed at, whether it's 35, 45 or 55 percent, that's the big deal," Doyle said. "The exemption is a drop in the bucket for a lot of wealthy people."
Expanded unemployment benefits would be extended for a year, and tax breaks for low-income families would be continued. That costs about $30 billion and isn't offset with spending cuts, according to people familiar with the talks.
The automatic spending cuts, which were the biggest stumbling block yesterday, would be delayed for two months from their scheduled start date of tomorrow.
Half of the $24 billion cost of delaying the cuts would be covered by allowing 401(k) retirement account holders to convert some of their balances into Roth-style accounts that can be tapped tax-free in retirement, said a Senate aide familiar with the talks.
The change would raise revenue because people who do such conversions pay income taxes up front. The conversions aren't currently allowed in 401(k) plans, the aide said.
The other half of the spending cuts would be prevented through replacement spending cuts, half in defense and half in nondefense programs, said Senator Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat.
Miscellaneous tax breaks would continue through 2013, including breaks for corporate research, multinationals' overseas financing operations and wind energy. Many of those breaks had expired at the end of 2011. Companies would get 50 percent bonus depreciation.
The agreement wouldn't avert all of the tax increases set to take effect this year. A two-percentage-point cut in the payroll tax has expired and isn't part of the emerging deal.
That will make paychecks smaller in 2013; someone earning $50,000 and being paid twice a month will lose $41.67 per paycheck. The payroll tax cut's expiration will end transfers from the general fund to Social Security to cover its cost.
Taxes on top earners' wages and unearned income such as capital gains will take effect, due to the start of revenue increases from the 2010 health care law.
The Internal Revenue Service told employers Monday night to withhold taxes from paychecks assuming that lapsing tax cuts would expire as scheduled and said it would issue updated tables if Congress passes an extension. Employers should implement the higher withholding by Feb. 15, the IRS said in a statement issued 12 minutes before midnight.
The agreement also sets up yet another fiscal fight, this time over raising the U.S. debt ceiling, which reached its $16.4 trillion limit Monday.
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner began taking so- called extraordinary measures to finance about $200 billion in debt this year.
Under normal circumstances, that would last about two months.
Republicans say they'll use the leverage created by the debt ceiling to force Obama to accept spending cuts, particularly in entitlement programs.
Obama resisted that notion Monday, saying he wants more tax increases that would come in part from limit tax breaks and that he won't accept Republican plans to "shove" spending cuts past him.
"If they think that's going to be the formula for how we solve this thing, then they've got another thing coming," he said. "That's not how it's going to work."
This report has been compiled from Bloomberg News, The Associated Press and CNN Breaking News.