Optimum Customers: Your Newsday access has been extended until Oct 1st. Enroll now to continue your access.

72° Good Evening
72° Good Evening

Kavanaugh argued the president can be impeached for lies, cover-ups and refusing to testify

It was 20 years ago this month that Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, set out his broad view of obstruction of justice and of what constitutes an impeachable offense.

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh leaves a meeting

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh leaves a meeting with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Capitol Hill in Washington on Tuesday. Photo Credit: Getty Images / Zach Gibson

WASHINGTON — The young attorney decided the president deserved to be forced from office for “his pattern of revolting behavior” and the “sheer number of his wrongful acts.”

“The president has disgraced his office. … He has lied to his aides. He has lied to the American people,” Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a 1998 memo to his colleagues. “I’m strongly opposed to giving (him) any ‘break’ … unless he either resigns or … issues a public apology.”

Kavanaugh, a fast-rising Republican legal star, then 33, went back to work on a 132-page memo to his boss, Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, that outlined the grounds for impeaching President Bill Clinton.

It was 20 years ago this month that Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, set out his broad view of obstruction of justice and of what constitutes an impeachable offense, arguing the president could be removed from office even for a rarely charged crime — in this case, lying under oath in a civil deposition, to deny a sexual affair with a 22-year-old White House intern. By repeating false stories for months, lying to the public and his aides, trying to cover up the affair with Monica Lewinsky and helping her find a job in New York, the president, Kavanaugh argued, engaged in “a conspiracy to obstruct justice.”

Now as Kavanaugh prepares to go before the Senate on Sept. 4 for his confirmation hearing, there is again talk of impeachment in Washington.

This week, Trump was implicated in a scheme to pay hush money shortly before the 2016 election to two women to cover up sexual affairs. His former attorney, Michael Cohen, has pleaded guilty to violating campaign finance laws and accused Trump of directing him to make the payments. Trump has publicly denied the women’s claims and denied knowing about the secret payments in advance, though he can be heard on tape discussing how to make them.

Trump is also under investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller for possible collusion between his campaign and Russia, and obstruction of justice in trying to hinder that probe.

“The Kavanaugh argument in the Starr Report is highly relevant now,” says New York lawyer David R. Lurie, because it portrayed a president’s false statements and public denials as reflecting a pattern of obstructing justice. If investigators “wanted a template for charging the president with acts of obstruction meriting impeachment, they could do worse than using sections of the Starr Report drafted by Kavanaugh,” Lurie said.

The Constitution says the president can be impeached for “treason, bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.” While scholars disagree on how to define an offense that warrants impeachment, most maintain it involves a significant abuse of power by the president.

In 1974, President Richard Nixon faced impeachment for obstruction of justice for arranging to pay hush money to the burglars who broke into the Watergate offices of the Democratic National Committee in 1972, and for intervening with the CIA and the FBI to thwart the investigation.

Starr’s investigators did not have evidence that Clinton used the machinery of the U.S. government to cover up his crimes as Nixon did. They did, however, have evidence he had lied when questioned under oath by lawyers for Paula Jones, who had sued him for sexual harassment.

News Photos and Videos

Important message for Optimum customers

Your Newsday digital access is changing as of 10/1

You recently received an email from Optimum’s parent company, Altice USA, informing you that Altice will no longer offer free Newsday digital access with Optimum's online service. Through an exclusive trial offer for Optimum customers, Newsday is pleased to extend your digital access at no cost until the end of the year.

I understand, no thanks