Good Morning
Good Morning

Tamerlan Tsarnaev's uncle trying to arrange Boston bombings suspect's burial

Ruslan Tsarni, left, uncle of killed Boston Marathon

Ruslan Tsarni, left, uncle of killed Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, departs the Graham, Putnam, and Mahoney Funeral Parlors, in Worcester, Mass., as funeral director and owner Peter Stefan, right, walks him to his car. (May 5, 2013) Credit: AP

          An Editor’s Note published July 12, 2017, about Kevin Deutsch’s reporting appears at the end of this story. 

WORCESTER, Mass. -- Cemeteries across the Boston area have refused to bury deceased marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and the funeral director looking after the body said on Sunday it's time to "separate the sin from the sinner."

"I've been taking heat on this since day one," said Peter Stefan, of Graham Putnam and Mahoney Funeral Parlors in Worcester. "Let's get it over with."

Stefan said local laws require the government to provide a burial plot for indigent people, including Tsarnaev.

But each of his requests to bury the man suspected of planning the April 15 bombings that killed three and injured more than 260 have been rejected, and local and federal officials have not helped, Stefan said.

The government of Russia -- where Tsarnaev was born before his family moved to the United States more than a decade ago -- has shown no interest in claiming the body and returning it to Tsarnaev's parents.

"The White House won't do anything and the Russians don't want him," Stefan said. "I'm the last stop."

Sunday, Tsarnaev's uncle visited the funeral home to help in the search for a willing cemetery and to pray along with three other men over Tsarnaev's body. Ruslan Tsarni said he could "understand no one wants to associate their names with such evil events."

Yet, his nephew "has no other place to be buried," Tsarni said outside the funeral home. "He lived in America. He grew up here and for the last 10 years he decided to be in Cambridge. Therefore, any contemplation that the body should be taken to a home country . . . His home country is Cambridge."

Outside, about 10 demonstrators gathered to denounce the director for accepting Tsarnaev's body.

"He should not be buried on U.S. soil," said Margaret Fanworth of Worcester. "We're at war with terrorists. Why are we giving them the same courtesy?"

As Fanworth and other protesters chanted "get the terrorist out of our city," Stefan said he had received more commendations then negative reaction.

"As this situation sinks in, people realize we have to" bury Tsarnaev. "That's what this country stands for," Stefan said. "Criticize me all you want, but criticism is cheap. We need ideas, and" the protesters "don't have any."

Stefan said he plans to contact the Massachusetts governor's office and the FBI Monday to ask for help after Cambridge officials rejected his pleas for a grave.

Cambridge officials issued a statement Sunday night saying they were not bound to allow Tsarnaev to be buried in the Cambridge Cemetery, where the indigent are sometimes laid to rest.

"The difficult and stressful efforts of the residents of the City of Cambridge to return to a peaceful life would be adversely impacted by the turmoil, protests and widespread media presence at such an interment," city manager Robert Healy said.

Editor’s note: Newsday undertook an extensive, four-month review of reporting by Kevin Deutsch, who covered law enforcement from April 2012 to September 2016.

The review of the former Newsday reporter’s work began after The Baltimore Sun this year reported that law enforcement and other officials questioned the veracity of Deutsch’s nonfiction book “Pill City” about Baltimore’s drug trade. In addition, questions arose about individuals named in Newsday stories by Deutsch. Book publisher St. Martin’s Press and Deutsch have said they stand behind the book.

We are dedicated to accurate, factual reporting, to the highest journalistic standards and to maintaining our credibility with Newsday readers. We also are committed to being accountable to our readers. Newsday undertook the detailed review in that spirit and because of the concerns that were raised.

In late February, as our review was under way, The New York Times reported in an editor’s note that The Times “had been unable to locate or confirm the existence of two people who were named and quoted” in a Dec. 29, 2016, freelance article written by Deutsch. Deutsch “maintains that the interviews and the descriptions are accurate,” The Times wrote.

Newsday reviewed 600 stories with reporting by Deutsch. We contacted officials in the police departments regularly involved in Deutsch’s coverage. They said they had not had problems with his work. We then focused our research and reporting on individuals who, as described in the stories, would not be considered officials, or well-known, public figures.

The review found 77 stories with 109 individuals from Deutsch’s reporting whom Newsday could not locate. The main points of the stories were not affected. While two stories about the Orlando nightclub shooter Omar Mateen were based on sources Newsday could not locate, other media reported the main points of those stories but with attribution from different sources.  In this story, Newsday could not locate: Margaret Fanworth. Newsday is attaching an editor’s note to each story online that contains individuals we cannot locate.

Here’s how Newsday conducted the review:

Researchers and reporters searched local and national public records, sites providing nationwide people searches, databases of business, real estate and conviction records, social media sites including Facebook, LinkedIn and and nationwide news archives. They searched potential alternate spellings and other name variations. Their reporting followed potential leads they found through research, within stories and in information shared by Deutsch during the review.

Finding people after publication, in some cases years later, can be difficult because of changes in residence, circumstance and contact information. Some may not have given their real names.

On the law enforcement beat, reporters may encounter people who lead lives that are not reflected in public records or other sources of information that would help locate them. It is possible that some on our list were difficult to find or reluctant to respond to our review because they are undocumented immigrants, those battling or recovering from addiction or people involved in or around illegal activity.

Some on our list were described discussing crimes in their neighborhoods, and others as relatives, friends or neighbors of victims or as individuals living near or knowing those accused of crimes.

Others we have not been able to locate, though, are described as bystanders, neighbors, spectators, relatives of drug victims, witnesses to news events or related in some way to people in the news. Still others are described in stories as people actively engaged in public issues, such as activists, protesters and marchers. Many individuals on the list are described as local.

Deutsch said in email exchanges with Newsday that “I have no doubt about the veracity of the claims of the sources I quoted.” He also said, “Not a single public official, source, or other interviewee has raised any issues with even one of these stories.”

“It's impossible for any reporter to know whether the name given to him by interviewees on the street--or those reached briefly by phone or email-- is that person's full and legal name, rather than an alias or variation of their real name (maiden names and certain common nicknames/abbreviations for first names are often published by newspapers, including Newsday.). But every one of the names on Newsday’s list was the name given to me by that interview subject, verbatim.”

During the four months of our review, Newsday shared questions and updates with Deutsch as we progressed in the search for individuals we could not locate. We requested notes and contact information. Deutsch sent us notes he said represented all individuals we were unable to locate and responded over the course of the review by email, sharing information he said was from his recollection and notes.

Reporters followed up on all information shared by Deutsch. He did not provide contact information for those on our list. Newsday reporters and editors sought unsuccessfully several times to meet with Deutsch to discuss his reporting and to review his notes together to ensure we were not missing contact information or other details that might help locate individuals. Deutsch maintained that the notes he shared “serve as evidence of interviews” with each source.

Deutsch said he kept contact information in a Rolodex he left behind at Newsday’s main office and in a company-issued cellphone he returned within a week after resigning on Sept. 6, 2016. Editorial staff did not find a Rolodex or other notes at our office, but found notes left at Newsday’s desk at a courthouse pressroom where he worked. We shared them with Deutsch and he confirmed they were his. As per company policy, the contents of the cellphone had been deleted immediately after Deutsch returned it to Newsday.

Maintaining the trust of our readers is essential to our mission.  If we are able subsequently to locate any individuals, we will update our stories.

News Photos and Videos