Letters: Voting rights solution worked

The Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. on The Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. on March 31, 2012. Photo Credit: Getty Images

advertisement | advertise on newsday

An analogy to the decision of the Supreme Court on the Voting Rights Act would be to compare it to a city that had a rash of crime and responded by hiring many police and giving them extensive training.

As a result, violent crime consequently diminished significantly. The powers that be therefore decided that all these police and their training were unnecessary, since there was so little violent crime. We dont need ESP to predict what happens next.

We also dont need ESP to predict what will happen to voting rights for minorities in the next election. 

Ruth Karter, Floral Park

 

advertisement | advertise on newsday

I disagree with the Supreme Court throwing out Arizonas proof-of-citizenship requirement for voters .

Our system of voting in this country stinks! Its also corrupt. In some states, a felon cannot vote, but a person in the country illegally can sneak in to vote.

In New York, you could vote twice and get away with it. My children registered to vote in our community, but when they moved away, they remained registered in the previous school district for perhaps 10 years. My wife and I repeatedly explained at the polls that our children had moved, but their names were not taken off the voter rolls.

U.S. citizens should have the right to vote and should prove that they are citizens, just as civil servants must present birth and high school certificates to be hired.

Joseph Taormina, Levittown 

Sign up for the Opinion newsletter and get the latest analysis delivered to your inbox.

You also may be interested in: