TODAY'S PAPER
38° Good Morning
38° Good Morning
Opinion

A possible end to fusion voting

Voting booths at West Babylon Junior High School

Voting booths at West Babylon Junior High School on Nov. 3, 2015. Credit: Barry Sloan

Daily Point

A hidden surprise

There is no end to the goodies that can be found in the spring basket that is the new state budget. One hidden Easter egg in particular can sweeten the clout of the major political parties and all but kill off the state’s myriad minor parties. And it’s not just the shiny nugget that could end fusion voting, or cross-endorsements, that is stirring all the buzz.

In the final hours of the budget negotiations, lawmakers and the governor agreed to establish a new commission that would design a public campaign financing system. The scramble over who could be the ninth commission member with a potential key vote in writing the rules is getting hotter by the hour. The commission must be formed by June.

The legislation gives the commission considerable power to change other election rules, particularly the ability of minor parties to give Democrat or Republican nominees their lines. Few states do it this way and that is why voters often see Democrats on the Working Families Party line and Republicans on the Conservative Party lines or other parties such as Women’s Equality and Reform. Except, of course, in Suffolk, which offers the especially bastardized Democratic-Conservative fusion experience.

The state allocated only $100 million for the public funding program for statewide offices and State Legislature seats, so the commission could justify ending cross-endorsements because it would cut down on the number of primary challenges that would qualify for funding.

But the end of cross-endorsements is not the only threat looming for the minor parties and their political bosses. The new law also charges the commission with looking at “political party qualifications,” and those three words are easy to read over amid all the other details. But match those words up with Sec 1 (3) of New York’s existing election law. That permits a political party automatic ballot access if it earns at least 50,000 votes in the previous gubernatorial election.

So the commission has the power to substantially raise that threshold and it's unlikely any minor party, except perhaps the Conservative Party, which gave 253,624 votes to Republican Marc Molinaro in 2018, survives. Tough decisions will be made by the Conservative Party to support an appealing candidate who can earn the threshold number of votes, but it would come at the cost of siphoning the vote from the Republican candidate whom the Conservative Party usually cross-endorses.

The Green Party, which currently commands the fourth line on the state ballot, has never given its line away to a major party candidate, instead running someone who espouses the party ideology. In 2018, Howie Hawkins got 103,946 votes.

Perhaps the loudest minor league player is the Working Families Party which only did slightly better than the Greens, garnering 114,478 votes for Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo. Fear of not reaching the 50,000 threshold is why the WFP unceremoniously dropped actress Cynthia Nixon after she lost the Democratic primary to Cuomo last year and then begged him to run on its line to qualify as a political party.

Not only can the commission change the voting threshold, it also could change when the qualifying statewide elections take place, possibly in both gubernatorial and presidential contests. And as soon as 2020. That could mean most minor parties would be gone by the 2021 races, unless they make the considerable and expensive effort to petition their way onto the ballot every year.

The commission’s recommendations are due by Dec. 1, and will become law unless the legislature overturns its report by Dec. 22. And for Democratic lawmakers to do so, would also mean killing the progressive wing’s long-desired goal of public campaign financing.

Revenge is a dish always best served cold.

Rita Ciolli

Talking Point

State Senate GOP fuzzy math

When is a funding increase described as a cut? When Senate Republicans look to take a swing at the Democrats who took over the chamber 13 weeks ago.

Wednesday Senate Republicans sent out a news release with the headline: “FLANAGAN: ENACTED STATE BUDGET CUTS $29 MILLION IN FOUNDATION AID FOR LONG ISLAND SCHOOLS”

But the news release quickly corrects itself, acknowledging in its second paragraph that Foundation Aid to Long Island will actually increase this year by $47 million, and the “cut” is in reference to the increase not being as large as last year.

The release then goes on to say, “The difference can be attributed to more aid being routed to New York City,” which is true in only the most cherry-picked reasoning imaginable.

Long Island did suffer a bit compared with NYC in Foundation Aid, but the region made up the difference in other pots of operating funding, including significant new money for pre-K programs, particularly in Nassau County districts.

Taken together, school funding experts say Long Island and the city did about as well as they always do in regards to each other, with the Island getting its usual 13 percent of state aid and the city receiving its standard 38 percent. This split has generally stayed the same for decades.

Asked about the release and the strategy, Senate Republican spokesman Scott Reif said: “The fact is they [Senate Democrats] stood up and yelled and screamed that they were going to get big increases for schools, particularly on Long Island, and they got the smallest increases in eight years.”

Lane Filler

Pencil Point

Out of time

For more cartoons, visit www.newsday.com/opinion

Final Point

Email blast: Gershon to announce 2020 decision

Political observers of the 1st Congressional District should watch their inboxes Friday.

Expect an advisory about a Saturday announcement event for Perry Gershon, the East Hampton Democrat who lost in his effort to unseat Rep. Lee Zeldin last year — one of the most expensive and widely watched House races in 2018.

Gershon has been hinting at another run for months, and thinks that his 4 percent loss as a first-time challenger to Zeldin, a Trump-favored Republican, warrants a second try.

But some Suffolk County Democrats have scrambled to find another candidate with different characteristics — military service, for example, or more roots in the district; Gershon only registered to vote there in 2017.

That candidate search is itself a recognition that anyone jumping into the race will have to do so soon to start fundraising. Gershon loaned or contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to himself during the primary last cycle, which helped to overwhelm the competition. And between Gershon and Zeldin, the general election cost some $10 million as money from PACs and individuals around the country flooded a crucial swing seat.

When asked about 2020 campaign plans, a Zeldin campaign spokesman emailed the following to The Point: “His focus far and away is on his job representing his constituents of NY-1. The last election just ended and the next Congressional election is still over a year and a half away.”

Odds are, it’ll be another expensive and heated race next year.

Mark Chiusano

Comments

We're revamping our Comments section. Learn more and share your input.

Columns