Yes, Verlander prevailed in a close race, although not that close.
I didn't have a vote in this one, but if I did, I would've selected Toronto's Jose Bautista first. I probably would've put Verlander second, though, and I would've fully understood as well if Jacoby Ellsbury placed first.
It was a close race. Difference of opinion is fun.
On the BBWAA conference call, Verlander said, "This may set a precedent" regarding starting pitchers and the MVP, and I'm gonna disagree with that call. Verlander's season was terrific, but not considerably more terrific than, say, Felix Hernandez last year.
No, I think Verlander benefited from a perfect storm: 1) He picked up a lot of wins, which are still meaningful to some in the voting body; 2) He pitched for a team for which he was far and away the best starting pitcher; and 3) His team made the playoffs.
Have a great night.