David Lennon David Lennon has been a staff writer for

David Lennon is an award-winning columnist and author who has been a staff writer at Newsday since 1991.

He was named one of the top 10 columnists in the country by the Associated Press Sports Editors in 2014 and also took first place in that category for New York State that same year.

Lennon began covering baseball for Newsday as the Yankees' beat writer in 1995, the season the Bombers snapped a 14-year playoff drought by becoming the American League's first wild-card team. Two World Series rings later, Lennon left the Yankees' beat after the 1998 season, bounced between the Bronx and Shea for the next three years, then took over on the Mets for the demise of Bobby Valentine in 2002. He became Newsday's national baseball writer in 2012.

Lennon also is a Hall of Fame voter, a former Chairman of the New York Chapter of the Baseball Writers Association of America and co-author of "The Great New York Sports Debate."
Show More

Before we take another deep dive into the seemingly bottomless debate about the length of a major-league baseball game, let’s get something out of the way right off the top.

The four-pitch intentional walk, terminated for the start of the 2017 season, was an unnecessary scapegoat of this discussion. Through Friday, there had been 55 of the new abridged freebies, saving 220 pitches overall and roughly 36 minutes — total — over two weeks. The cost has been adding some weirdly disorientating moments, along with removing a basic element of the sport itself.

“I think that’s the worst thing that’s ever been done,” Yankees reliever Tyler Clippard said.

So what was the result of all that pitch-trimming? After the first 119 games, a virtual toe-dip into the more than 2,000 played each season, the length of a nine-inning game actually has jumped to 3 hours, 5 minutes, 45 seconds, according to early data provided by MLB.

That’s more than a five-minute increase from last season (3:00:42) and almost 10 minutes from 2015 (2:56:14). Compare that with the decade-low mark of 2:50:38 established in 2008, and MLB appears to be going backward.

To some degree, it’s a cost of technological advancement. The expansion of video replay — describing the laborious process as “instant” doesn’t real ly fit — definitely has caused a drag, and this season, for whatever reason, has felt especially painful early on.

The concept behind video replay is sound: to get calls right. But the machinery has mutated into a pace-sucking monster, making us think it soon could be time to pull back the reins.

advertisement | advertise on newsday

When then-commissioner Bud Selig first set the plan in motion, the idea was to prevent controversial, game-changing calls from taking attention away from the entertainment product on the field. It’s a noble cause, and it was worthwhile to pursue it. But to now routinely challenge a bang-bang 6-3 putout in the first inning, freezing the game before it barely has gotten started, isn’t beneficial to anyone.

Better to endure a 3 1⁄2-hour contest than be subjected to the choppy gaps of inactivity these types of replays are producing.

Obviously, there is an upside, especially with questionable home runs and plays at the plate. But is the proliferation of replay actually good for the sport?

Through the first 130 games, 91 plays had been reviewed, with 42 (or 46.2 percent) being overturned. According to MLB, the average time of a video review is 1:36. Maybe less time than it takes to neatly fill out a scorecard, depending on the quality of your handwriting.

So what’s been the holdup overall? The biggest culprit doesn’t take many guesses: the between-inning commercial breaks.

@NewsdaySports

For a closer examination, we conducted our own non-scientific study involving Thursday night’s game between the Yankees and Rays. With the help of a DVR, we kept track of the game action, then fast-forwarded through the commercials, which of course are aired every half-inning.

The official time of Thursday’s game, the one that appeared in the boxscore, was 2 hours, 59 minutes — fairly brisk by today’s standards. It was low-scoring, with the Yankees winning, 3-2, and also entertaining. Luis Severino struck out 11 in seven innings and the Yankees needed only two relievers, Dellin Betances and Aroldis Chapman, so it featured relatively few pitching changes.

And of those nearly three hours, how much baseball did you actually see during the YES broadcast?

A little more than two hours. By our stopwatch calculations, it was 2:09, meaning roughly a third of the entire broadcast was spent airing commercials.

That’s the reality of professional sports. It’s a business enterprise, designed to produce revenue, so showing ads is as much a part of any game as balls and strikes.

advertisement | advertise on newsday

During Thursday’s broadcast, there were 18 commercial breaks — six per hour — which included two that occurred for a pair of Rays mound visits and pitching changes.

Shaving even seconds from that time probably is fantasy, but maybe it’s not as outlandish as previously thought. NFL commissioner Roger Goodell suggested last month that cutting down the length and frequency of TV commercials is something that will be talked about in their own pace-of-game discussions. You can bet the NFL will come up with other revenue streams to make up for those financial sacrifices — if they indeed come to pass — but it doesn’t sound as if MLB is prepared to take such drastic steps. Not before trying other methods first.

Things get complicated, however, when those ideas affect how the game is played. Any significant changes — such as a pitch clock — initially must be negotiated between MLB and the Players Association, but the only one agreed on for this season was the no-pitch intentional walk, which has proved merely cosmetic.

For 2018, commissioner Rob Manfred could implement changes on his own after giving the union a heads-up one year in advance, as CBA provisions have allowed the commissioner to do. In the past, MLB has avoided such unilateral moves, preferring to work diplomatically with the union.

A 20-second pitch clock already has been deployed in the minor leagues, so baseball is past the beta-testing phase. But could other already-existing measures work if properly enforced?

advertisement | advertise on newsday

One example is hitters keeping at least one foot in the batter’s box, as Rule 6.02 (d) dictates, but MLB has wavered on policing it.

Chase Headley said the commissioner’s office still sends out letters to players who break the rule, but he had not heard of anyone being fined lately for the offense.

The Rays’ Evan Longoria, a 10-year vet, rarely moves as much as a toe outside the box, firmly planting both feet throughout the at-bat. Yet others believe the occasional pauses are necessary.

“I might step out to collect my thoughts, maybe after a bad pitch or something,” Headley said. “Frankly, I don’t think it has a lot to do with holding up the game.”

That mindset could be generational, as MLB has been more proactive in recent years about keeping players in the batter’s box by pounding that concept in the minors. Aaron Judge, 23, has been groomed by that protocol during his rise in the Yankees’ organization, and he said the umpires down there diligently reminded him when he stepped to the plate. He pretty much stays put in the majors.

“They were trying to brainwash us,” Judge said, smiling. “So I never knew any different.”

Are games too long? Depends whom you ask. But this year, they are longer, so the debate won’t be going away anytime soon.

“Baseball has been around for more than 100 years,” Clippard said. “It’s a three-hour game. Sometimes it’s 2:15. Things happen. You can try to change all the rules, but it’s never going to be perfect. And there’s nothing wrong with that.”