Voters this year are deciding on two proposed amendments to the state's constitution. Both are presented in turgid language that is, unfortunately, typical. Don’t be discouraged.

First, both proposals appear on the reverse side of the ballot, so make sure to flip it over and fill those boxes before submitting it. Essentially, the amendments involve the choices state residents have in authorizing the necessary financing for desired school and sewer projects.

Proposal One would eliminate the constitutional debt limit for small-city school districts. Proposal Two also affects borrowing mechanisms. It would extend, for another 10 years, New York municipalities’ ability to finance and add to sewer systems — improvements that are crucial to meet the rising challenges of climate change and development.

The state in the meantime needs to present these measures in an easier-to-understand way by providing clearer explanations. Officials must provide better ballot display and jargon-free language so that voters don’t shy away from learning what’s to be decided.

Below, learn more about the propositions and see our positions on both.

Endorsements are determined solely by the Newsday editorial board, a team of opinion journalists focused on issues of public policy and governance. Newsday’s news division has no role in this process.

SUBSCRIBE

Unlimited Digital AccessOnly 25¢for 6 months

ACT NOWSALE ENDS SOON | CANCEL ANYTIME