Letter: Unfair to raise age for Social Sec.
Credit: ISTOCK
Raising the retirement age is often put forward as part of the solution for shoring up Social Security ["Get real about saving Social Security," Editorial, Sept. 14]. The justification is that with life expectancies rising, people are collecting benefits longer.
One important fact, however, is seldom mentioned: Life expectancy varies with income. People with higher incomes live longer. Raising the retirement age, therefore, would mean a bigger cut in lifetime benefits for lower-income people than upper.
This is doubly unfair, because lower-income people are taxed on all their income, while income over $106,800 is not subject to the Social Security tax. The only fair way to improve the funding for Social Security is to lift this cap.
Richard G. Shelp Jr., Bridgehampton
'The strategy that I'm seeing ... is very chaotic' A Newsday review of court records sheds new light on ICE's Long Island operation and where it's happening. NewsdayTV's Ken Buffa, Shari Einhorn, investigative reporter Josefa Velásquez and attorney Reuben Kerben break it down.
