Credit: ISTOCK

Raising the retirement age is often put forward as part of the solution for shoring up Social Security ["Get real about saving Social Security," Editorial, Sept. 14]. The justification is that with life expectancies rising, people are collecting benefits longer.

One important fact, however, is seldom mentioned: Life expectancy varies with income. People with higher incomes live longer. Raising the retirement age, therefore, would mean a bigger cut in lifetime benefits for lower-income people than upper.

This is doubly unfair, because lower-income people are taxed on all their income, while income over $106,800 is not subject to the Social Security tax. The only fair way to improve the funding for Social Security is to lift this cap.

Richard G. Shelp Jr., Bridgehampton

On the latest episode of "Sarra Sounds Off," Gregg Sarra and Matt Lindsay  recap all the state wrestling action from Albany this past weekend, plus Jared Valluzzi has the ice hockey championship results from Binghamton. Credit: Newsday

Sarra Sounds Off, Ep. 25: Wrestling and hockey state championships On the latest episode of "Sarra Sounds Off," Gregg Sarra and Matt Lindsay recap all the state wrestling action from Albany this past weekend, plus Jared Valluzzi has the ice hockey championship results from Binghamton.

SUBSCRIBE

Unlimited Digital AccessOnly 25¢for 6 months

ACT NOWSALE ENDS SOON | CANCEL ANYTIME