Why is East Hills earmark justified?
Rep. Gary Ackerman holds a press conference in March. Credit: Danielle Finkelstein
Regarding Paul Greenberg's column concerning the possible ban on earmarks ["The great orator lapses into polspeak," Opinion, Dec. 5], one must question Rep. Gary Ackerman's proposal to earmark $100,000 to an after-school program in East Hills, a well-to-do town.
One must question the rationale of using taxpayer funds for this one program. Aren't after-school programs more desirable in towns with less affluence? Then again, how can you decide one program is more worthy then another?
Manhasset Hills
Updated 51 minutes ago Hochul to sign Aid in Dying bill ... Woman struck by car dies ... MTA plans fare, toll hikes ... Let's Go: Williamsburg winter village
