Roger Clemens against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Yankee Stadium on...

Roger Clemens against the Pittsburgh Pirates at Yankee Stadium on June 9, 2007. Credit: Newsday/Paul J. Bereswill

This year there is no player who fans will wonder if one of us Baseball Hall of Fame voters will be the one to spoil a unanimous induction, and maybe there isn't even a player who will earn the necessary 75 percent of votes to get into the Hall.

Last year it was simple to put a check mark next to Derek Jeter, but it was also the first time that I didn’t use all 10 possible spots on my ballot. And it’s something I will do again this time — not adding a single player who I haven’t voted for in previous years.

Before I had a vote for the Baseball Hall of Fame, it was easy to engage in the arguments about steroids and statistics. But when you hold that ballot in your hands, as I have for the last six years, it becomes a much tougher debate with yourself.

The most pressing issue is steroids, the one that Major League Baseball and the Hall of Fame never settled, leaving it in the hands of voters. And my line has been this: If a player was proved to be a user, suspended or banned, he is out.

Based on conversations with baseball officials over the years, there is a belief that a huge percentage of players were using, so maybe I will lower that bar someday, allowing players such as twice-suspended Manny Ramirez onto my ballot.

The other parameter with steroids: If I believe many were using, how did the player compare with his peers before or during the time that PEDs were thought to be pervasive?

By that rule, I never have filled out a ballot that didn’t include Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.

Most everyone believes their claims of innocence are false, but they also were dominant players before and during the steroid era.

But it’s not the only issue as you combine advanced statistical analysis, comparisons with current and past players and even the eye test about how dominant the player was in his time.

One tough debate is over certain positions — relief pitchers and designated hitters. With relievers, do you give credit to saves, the traditional measurement, or the more reliable analytics — two ideas that separate Billy Wagner from Hall of Famers Trevor Hoffman and Lee Smith?

So here’s what I came up with this year:

THE HOLDOVERS

Barry Bonds

The best hitter before, during and after suspicion of PEDs. It’s impossible to vote for anyone suspected if you don’t vote for Bonds.

Roger Clemens

Like Bonds, Clemens was dominant at every level. He got better late, and that raises red flags, but he was so good early, too.

Scott Rolen

Consistent hitter and fielder with numbers that put him right with Hall of Fame third basemen.

Curt Schilling

No matter what he’s done to embarrass himself after his career, he was as good as anyone in big spots. So for another year, maybe more than ever before, I hold my nose and vote for him.

Billy Wagner

Wagner doesn’t have the saves, but that’s the worst stat for a reliever. Best BAA, WHIP and K/9 of any pitcher in history.

Andruw Jones

A 10-time Gold Glove winner in centerfield for the Braves, he was not just an elite defender, but also a powerful hitter. His candidacy has been hurt by injuries that cut his career short and caused him to drastically fall off after age 31. He was a near-miss, but in a less crowded year he should garner more support.

The breakdown

Slam dunk: Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens.

Solid picks: Scott Rolen.

Borderline yes: Curt Schilling, Billy Wagner, Andruw Jones.

Borderline left off: Torii Hunter, Omar Vizquel, Jeff Kent, Andy Pettitte, Gary Sheffield.

More MLB news